Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
| 2020-05-18 05:27:24 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2019-06-26 17:43:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2018-10-15 12:17:39 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2018-02-17 15:00:37 +0200 | commented answer | SageMath as a regular python package I guess I was looking for the pip-installable package ticket. Thanks! |
| 2018-02-17 14:59:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
| 2018-02-17 14:59:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
| 2018-02-08 20:55:56 +0200 | commented answer | SageMath as a regular python package While it is cool that sage is packed as a conda package (I was not aware of that - thanks) it's still not a regular python package in the sense that you can't import it from a regular python script that is being run by a regular python binary. |
| 2018-02-05 06:44:24 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
| 2018-02-03 11:18:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
| 2018-02-03 10:59:00 +0200 | asked a question | SageMath as a regular python package If one were to endeavor converting SageMath into a regular python package, which parts would be easy to convert and which would be difficult? I imagine such a conversion project ending up with a package that can be installed with pip or conda. After the package is installed any python script can import sage and can be run with the system's plain old python binary. |
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.