2023-07-31 18:05:24 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2023-07-29 10:20:07 +0200 | commented answer | sol = solve([x^2+y^2+z^2==2, x^3+y^3+z^3==2,x^4+y^4+z^4==2], x,y,z) Thank you very much for your answer. I update my version of SageMath immediately. |
2023-07-29 10:18:35 +0200 | marked best answer | sol = solve([x^2+y^2+z^2==2, x^3+y^3+z^3==2,x^4+y^4+z^4==2], x,y,z) Hello, to answer a question asked on QUORA I asked SageMath to solve the following system of 3 equations with 3 unknowns. I got 9 solutions: 3 real and 6 complex. A reader answered me this: In fact, there are 15 solutions. SageMath forgets certain permutations. And it doesn't give the exact values (except for the three obvious real solutions). Can any of you explain to me how to get all the exact solutions (with exponentials)? I thank you in advance. |
2023-07-29 01:15:29 +0200 | commented question | sol = solve([x^2+y^2+z^2==2, x^3+y^3+z^3==2,x^4+y^4+z^4==2], x,y,z) Indeed I still work with version 7.3. I will make the transition as soon as possible to the latest version. A big thank |
2023-07-29 00:37:26 +0200 | asked a question | sol = solve([x^2+y^2+z^2==2, x^3+y^3+z^3==2,x^4+y^4+z^4==2], x,y,z) sol = solve([x^2+y^2+z^2==2, x^3+y^3+z^3==2,x^4+y^4+z^4==2], x,y,z) Hello, to answer a question asked on QUORA I asked S |
2023-06-23 08:21:04 +0200 | commented question | Why does Sage seem to be wrong? You are right, I still use Sage v7.3. |
2023-06-23 00:53:17 +0200 | commented answer | Why does Sage seem to be wrong? Thank you for your quick reply, which I understood, but as I'm still working with Sage v7.3 the instruction real_nth_roo |
2023-06-23 00:15:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-06-23 00:15:35 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-06-23 00:11:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-06-23 00:10:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-06-23 00:07:23 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-06-23 00:07:23 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-06-23 00:05:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-06-23 00:05:34 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-06-22 23:34:49 +0200 | asked a question | Why does Sage seem to be wrong? Why does Sage seem to be wrong? I ask Sage to calculate the following expression x = (70 - 13*sqrt(29))^(1/3) + (70 + 1 |
2023-02-26 16:30:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-05-20 23:54:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-05-20 23:54:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-12-24 15:53:25 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-12-24 15:53:25 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-12-16 09:43:45 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-12-15 23:42:31 +0200 | commented answer | Square, cube, octahedron, equations Thank you for your reply. She made me understand that I have math gaps. I'm going to check out math sites to try and figure out what L-infinity norm is. I have cut out! |
2020-12-15 11:00:00 +0200 | asked a question | Square, cube, octahedron, equations We know that $|x| + |y| - 1 = 0$ is the equation of a square having its vertices on the axes. I asked to represent the equation $|x| + |y| + |z| - 1 - 0$, believing to obtain a cube in space. But I obtain an octahedron. Why? And how do you get a cube? |
2020-08-26 15:54:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2020-08-26 15:54:33 +0200 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2020-08-26 10:18:15 +0200 | answered a question | output.txt not updated This problem has already made me bitch a few times until I found a solution: I copy the script to a new cell, make the modifications and there I get a new "full_output.txt file" which takes into account my modifications. One response says: "But reloading should get you what you want." I have found that this is not true! the old "full_output.txt file" is still present. (sorry for my bad english, i use google translator) |
2019-01-24 16:28:04 +0200 | commented question | Problem with boring message Excuse me for the delay in answering you. I did a restoration of my previous work to the problem caused by the use of LaTeX, which I do not need, and everything is back to normal. Sorry for your lost time. |
2019-01-19 23:12:50 +0200 | commented question | Problem with boring message Good evening, I do not use Latex.After being seen on the site ctan.org I decided that I did not need Latex. I also tried bits of codes like to see what that gave. As said in my request I always get the following message. Error: PDFLaTeX does not seem to be installed. Download it from ctan.org and try again. None What is serious now is that if I activate cells that already contain code that worked I still get this message and nothing else. |
2019-01-19 17:45:55 +0200 | asked a question | Problem with boring message In one of my worksheets I wanted to test Latex. I was directed to ctan.org After reading a bit about it, I decided that I did not need it. But since this test, whenever one of my exercises launches I get the following message and nothing else. How to get rid of this? Thanks in advance for your time. Error: PDFLaTeX does not seem to be installed. Download it from ctan.org and try again. None |
2018-12-06 09:43:04 +0200 | commented answer | Speed a function with hex grid and primes numbers I did two more tests, here is the result: I think the matrix has become too big. We must find another method of resolution, either mathematical or computer. I'll think about it. Anyway thank Mr. Lelièvre you for your help that allowed me to learn new concepts about prime numbers. |
2018-12-05 10:52:19 +0200 | commented answer | Speed a function with hex grid and primes numbers I'm going to run the program for more value from "lim" quite to running my computer all night. I will provide the results later. |
2018-12-05 10:47:09 +0200 | commented answer | Speed a function with hex grid and primes numbers I tested your second idea in more depth. As soon as we increase the value of "lim" it is your second idea that is the most powerful. The curve that adjusts the pairs of points (DP3, time) seems parabolic or exponential. So it's not pleasant since you have to reach a DP3 = 2016. Rather than the brute force of the computer, there must be a simpler mathematical process that goes beyond me. It is simply frustrating to feel incapable of not knowing the right simplification techniques. Thank you |
2018-12-04 00:10:08 +0200 | commented answer | Speed a function with hex grid and primes numbers Thanks for your answer but your idea is slower. I have made a little try.
|
2018-11-30 17:31:22 +0200 | asked a question | Speed a function with hex grid and primes numbers Hello, I am trying to solve the question 175 of the Turing Challenge. We create a network of hexagonal tiles containing the following integers 1, 2, 3, 4, ... I represent this network in a square matrix by placing the number 1 in the center of the matrix. We must calculate the difference between each tile numbered n and each of its six neighbors, we will call DP (n) the number of these differences # which are a prime number. My problem is this: I have to calculate a lot of times the function below. We save in DP3 the n which are surrounded by exactly 3 prime numbers. Here is all my script. My idea is this: every time I have completed a turn I can calculate the DP3 of the previous turn. The program stops when len (DP3) = 2016. As the spirals become bigger and bigger you have to make more and more calls to the DP3 () search function. My question is: is it possible to speed up this function? PS: I'm sorry for my bad english. I also note that I am a beginner in programming. |
2018-10-27 10:43:32 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |