| 2024-06-30 22:59:04 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2021-08-31 11:15:10 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2021-04-01 14:13:30 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2019-09-02 09:59:40 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
| 2019-09-01 19:22:03 +0100 | asked a question | Vector valued function: unable to convert to symbolic expression This has been giving me quite a headache. It seems that I am unable to create even a simple vector-valued function of multiple variables. For example, the following
spits out a big traceback ending with
What's going on here? I know I can use substitution instead, but what if I'd prefer a callable function? |
| 2019-02-15 07:29:14 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2018-02-28 17:43:21 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2017-08-10 15:33:47 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
| 2017-07-27 01:02:46 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2017-07-21 23:57:36 +0100 | commented answer | Piecewise Symbolic Function with Conditional Statement There isn't any sort of conditional statement in the above code, which is what my question addresses. |
| 2017-07-21 19:52:38 +0100 | asked a question | Piecewise Symbolic Function with Conditional Statement I wish to incorporate a conditional Python expression ( Suppose I have a piecewise function k(n) defined for n = 1,2,3... as in the following pseudocode: I compose this with another function g(x) and wish to integrate the result. For example, How can implement a non-evaluating conditional in a symbolic Sage function? |
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.