2024-06-28 21:11:37 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-07-08 17:26:43 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-11-22 14:35:19 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-04-08 12:33:42 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2016-07-26 23:03:08 +0100 | commented answer | check if symbolic expression contains a variable Is there an extension of this to functions? For example, ? I am aware that this does not work as written, but I wonder if it is possible to extend it. |
2016-07-26 22:42:46 +0100 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2016-07-26 22:41:17 +0100 | asked a question | Detecting highest order derivative of a function in an equation I am working with some code that generates an equation with a number of derivatives. I do not know the order of the derivatives or the order. If I was working with something algebraic, for example: I could use something like to find out the highest order of and see that in fact that derivative is there somewhere. But what I really want, is for to have something that (a) tells me 'eqn has |
2016-07-22 20:09:26 +0100 | commented answer | What is broken on this site Yes. After someone replied to the post I linked above I was bumped to 11 karma and was able to submit the answer to the original question I wanted to answer. I realize this is not a problem for me now, but it is a hindrance to new users. |
2016-07-22 20:07:13 +0100 | commented question | Posting answers as a new user Is there some indication that an answer has been submitted and is up for approval? I did not receive such a notice. I think seeing that would have comforted me. |
2016-07-20 09:30:33 +0100 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2016-07-20 09:22:58 +0100 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2016-07-20 09:22:58 +0100 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2016-07-19 21:41:02 +0100 | answered a question | What is broken on this site I recently joined the site to post an answer to something that I realized I could help with. However, I soon went on to discover that one needs at least 10 karma to answer. I can see how there is a need to eliminate spam, but I think the site could benefit from some other form of verification so as to not scare off new users. |
2016-07-19 21:37:00 +0100 | commented question | Posting answers as a new user This is fixed now that someone up-voted this post. Therefore it appears that you need at least 10 karma to answer a question. I think this is something that should be fixed. |
2016-07-19 21:35:41 +0100 | answered a question | Pattern matching in differential equations Wildcards might help you here. For instance, I got this (not ideal) way to produce what you want: Now obviously it would be nice if Sage could just notice that but |
2016-07-19 11:56:09 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2016-07-18 20:18:45 +0100 | commented answer | Posting answers as a new user All that appears to have changed is that I do not need to enter a captcha now, my post is still not submitting. Maybe it is relevant that the post is a wiki? I also wonder if this issue can be placed on the FAQ or another place where new users can easily find this information. |
2016-07-18 20:02:54 +0100 | asked a question | Posting answers as a new user I am a newcomer to http://ask.sagemath.org. I have found a question which I know how to answer but when I try to submit the page simply refreshes. I am guessing this has something to do with having low karma but am unsure how to increase my karma since I do not have any questions at this time. I found a similar unreplied to question (to which I apparently cannot link because my karma is insufficient?) on askbot but the solution there of adding a comment first does not work for me. Any ideas on how to fix this are appreciated. |