2016-10-18 13:13:15 +0100 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
2016-10-18 13:13:15 +0100 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2016-10-18 12:08:32 +0100 | answered a question | Typeset mode in iPython notebook You can write the below code in your file, & it may work.
|
2016-05-15 06:03:29 +0100 | answered a question | Different syntax to solve Apart from the good answer given by @ndomes , here are some codes: In eq1, correct the sign between P and emi (and I think the number of "variables to solve for" should be atleast equal to number of equations to get a solution): The below code is same but visually different: |
2016-05-14 13:01:18 +0100 | commented answer | How to Rationalize the Denominator of a Fraction ? Basically, what are algebraic calculations? or are there any consequences of turning on the algebraic maxima_calculus on precision or general calculations in sage ? From your below answer, another method to set it to true. |
2016-05-13 20:02:36 +0100 | commented answer | Different syntax to solve Thanks for the neat code. Can you please explain why the below code doesn't work: It looks like 4 equations, and only one variable to solve. |
2016-05-13 17:59:53 +0100 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2016-05-11 17:21:35 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2016-05-11 14:38:40 +0100 | asked a question | Different syntax to solve I've below equation( j.mp/sage_emi ) involving 4 variables. I've fixed 3 variables' values, but can't get the 4th variables' value (both, including numerical). Can someone fix the code? Manually, I can get the answer for emi as 1210/21. It would be helpful if someone writes 2,3 different sage code to achieve the same above objective. I'm just curious can we do this: |