2022-07-22 13:55:54 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-02-23 11:38:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-02-23 11:38:51 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-05-02 12:21:12 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-11-16 09:45:10 +0200 | asked a question | plot arbitrary 2 vectors I just tried to plot these 2 vectors a and b: but an error occurs: ValueError: too many values to unpack any help ??? |
2013-11-04 05:23:26 +0200 | commented answer | why using numpy thank you so much for your reply. The problem is that i am dealing with very large numbers that exceed the ranges fro numpy integers and doubles, so i have to use sage. |
2013-11-04 05:20:03 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2013-10-25 15:37:07 +0200 | asked a question | precision when using numpy when using numpy, do i have to take care of the ranges for integers, floats, ..etc. and what if the number exceeds the limits for int64 or float64, what shall i do then ? and does this problem exist als for the normal integer data type in sage ('sage.rings.integer.Integer'> ) ??? |
2013-10-25 15:33:45 +0200 | asked a question | why using numpy what is the advantage of using numpy arrays, matrices, integers, floats, ..etc. over the normal ones in sage ?? |
2013-10-25 15:27:44 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2013-10-25 15:11:00 +0200 | asked a question | Problem with numpy integers and floats 1) 1st problem the answer is wrong; it should be 647208138850831221463 1) 2nd problem the answer is negative, How Come ??? 1) 3rd problem Why doesn't it give me all the numbers instead of this e*20 ??? Moreover, i just used normal int of sage ( |