2020-11-09 23:52:27 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2017-06-01 18:43:13 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-06-01 18:43:13 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-11-02 23:40:59 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-01-14 10:57:11 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-10-29 17:32:17 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-06-11 22:57:59 +0200 | asked a question | ergodic markov chain - steady state Hello every one Is there anyway to define the ergodic markov chain or even the steady-state probability and select one state based on the given probability for each iteration?? Best Aissan |
2013-06-11 10:08:39 +0200 | asked a question | Un bounded Answer MILP Hello I have an MILP problem .... I set the max of the all variables but some times the sage give me un bounded answer ..... Do you have any suggestion ... I even considered a constraint which is ( the objective function < T ) and defined T as a Integer variable and minimized the T .... but still it happened some times ...... Best Aissan |
2013-06-11 10:04:37 +0200 | commented question | wrong Answer in MILP :sage I considered the if which check the value if it bigger than 0.5 it consider 1 otherwise zero ...... anyway I am so grateful for all your consideration ... |
2013-06-11 10:01:04 +0200 | commented question | wrong Answer in MILP :sage yes I checked ........ I found the problem .... I used the get value, since it give me the real value sometimes it give some value near the zero or one |
2013-06-06 22:25:32 +0200 | asked a question | wrong Answer in MILP :sage hello everyone .... I have MILP optimization problem. when I solve the problem and use the get_values function: Although I sets the variables BINARY but it give me real values like(+0.0) or (-0.0).... it caused I get the value wrong because when i check the value ==0 or ==1 in this case i receive the wrong answer..... any suggestion.....??? Thanks Aissan |