2020-08-14 19:02:03 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-08-09 07:30:44 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-08-07 13:14:08 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2013-04-16 05:12:54 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2013-04-15 16:19:38 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2013-04-15 12:02:48 +0200 | commented answer | solve with "excess" equations Thank you, I kind of went the "smart_solve" way, it just meant yet another iteration of ifs and fors in my application which I'd have liked to avoid. I had expected "solve" to be a bit smarter by itself but perhaps there would be too many implications if you'd expect a full test for solvability. Perhaps an error would be better instead of an empty solution though. |
2013-04-15 09:54:19 +0200 | asked a question | solve with "excess" equations Why does the following work but this gives an empty solution? Can |