andre's profile - activity

2020-08-14 19:02:03 +0200	received badge	● Notable Question (source)
2020-08-09 07:30:44 +0200	received badge	● Popular Question (source)
2020-08-07 13:14:08 +0200	received badge	● Nice Question (source)
2013-04-16 05:12:54 +0200	received badge	● Supporter (source)
2013-04-15 16:19:38 +0200	received badge	● Student (source)
2013-04-15 12:02:48 +0200	commented answer	solve with "excess" equations Thank you, I kind of went the "smart_solve" way, it just meant yet another iteration of ifs and fors in my application which I'd have liked to avoid. I had expected "solve" to be a bit smarter by itself but perhaps there would be too many implications if you'd expect a full test for solvability. Perhaps an error would be better instead of an empty solution though.
2013-04-15 09:54:19 +0200	asked a question	solve with "excess" equations Why does the following work `solve([a + b - 1, a - b], [a, b])` but this `solve([a + b - 1, a - b, c + d], [a, b])` gives an empty solution? Can `solve` be convinced to ignore unnecessary equations?