tmonteil's profile - activity

You can first solve the integral symbolically : sage: i = integral(exp(-1/x)/x,x,0,1) sage: i -Ei(-1) You can get inf

It seems not implemented on the floating-point complex numbers, nor on the complex algebraic numbers: sage: R.<x,y&g

It seems not implemented on the floating-point complex numbers, nor on the complex algebraic numbers: sage: R.<x,y&g

It seems not implemented on the floating-point complex numbers, nor on the complex algebraic numbers: sage: R.<x,y&g

It seems not implemented on the floating-point complex numbers, nor on the complex algebraic numbers: sage: R.<x,y&g

It seems not implemented on the floating-point complex numbers, nor on the complex algebraic numbers: sage: R.<x,y&g

It seems not implemented on the floating-point complex numbers, nor on the complex algebraic numbers: sage: R.<x,y&g

You can first solve the integral symbolically : sage: i = integral(exp(-1/x)/x,x,0,1) sage: i -Ei(-1) You can get inf

You can first solve the integral symbolically : sage: i = integral(exp(-1/x)/x,x,0,1) sage: i -Ei(-1) Then, you can c

You should provide more details on how to reproduce the issue. What is different with that ipynb file ?

How to Sage install on linux (maybe not needed, because it was installed) see https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/insta

I edited my answer.

Could you please make your question more precise ? The origin is located at the intersection of the axes: sage: graph +

Could you please provide the whole code so that we can reproduce ?

Could you please make your question more precise ? The origin is located at the intersection of the axes: sage: graph +

numeric precision unexpecedly low I try to integrate a probability density function over an fixed interval. Can't give

You should have a look at the expression test, wich is a very huge. Hence, when turned numerical, a lot of roundings acc

You can use power series as follows: sage: q=4 ; m=33 ; k=31 sage: R.<t> = PowerSeriesRing(QQ) sage: f = ((1-t^q)

You can use power series as follows: sage: q=4 ; m=33 ; k=31 sage: R.<t> = PowerSeriesRing(QQ) sage: f = ((1-t^q)

As a general rule, i would recommend not to use the same term for symbols and polynomial indeterminates. Regarding your

As a general rule, i would recommend not to use the same term for symbols and polynomial indeterminates. Regarding your

The way you did works for me, if i replace @parallel with @parallel(ncpus=8)

SInce you have to run the computation on various graphs, you can do some basic parallelism provided by the @parallel dec

The way you did seems to work for me.

It seems to work for me.

SInce you have to run the computation on various graphs, you can do some basic parallelism provided by the @parallel dec

I am not sure about the notation $\lambda'$ so let me assume that it is the conjugate. First, to build a matrix, you ha

I am not sure about the notation $\lambda'$ so let me assume that it is the conjugate. First, to build a matrix and to

Thanks for reporting, this is clearly a bug, i can reproduce it on latest Sage version 9.4.beta3, it is know tracked at

This is definitely a bug, thanks for reporting! As you can see in the source code: sage: QQbar.__contains__?? the tes

Square brackets are used to define lists, but you can nest parentheses: sage: pi_m = ((1+d)*g_1 + r*(1-d*mu)-c*d^2)^(2)

For those interested, there is a parallel discussion on that topic on sage-devel : https://groups.google.com/g/sage-deve

For those interester, there is a parallel discussion on that topic on sage-devel : https://groups.google.com/g/sage-deve

Apparently, the matrix A has some nonezero entries along the diagonal, which is not allowed for adjacency matrices. We c

Could you please provide a way to fetch the 42-matrix-of-size-378.txt file so that we can see the actual issue ? If this

You can use one of the following: sage: p.subs({x:X,y:Y}) sage: p.subs(x=X,y=Y) The first passes a dictionary to the

This is the expected behaviour. When you type 29, the Sage preparser ensures that this number is considered as a Sage in

The website https://ask.sagemath.org/ is currently hosted in the computer science lab of the university Paris north (a.k

When solve returns the original system of equations, it means that it was not able to solve it. solve relies on symbolic

Idem, use double braces around v.

You sould use double the braces as follows: v = {(i,j): var("v_{}{}".format(i, j), latex_name="v_{{{}{}}}".format(i, j)