2023-10-04 13:49:27 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-07-11 19:50:34 +0100 | answered a question | Color nodes of poset The solution is to build the poset with an explicit "facade = True", even though this should have been the default. I st |
2022-07-11 19:38:25 +0100 | commented question | Color nodes of poset possibly related: although "alpha[4] in Q" is True, "alpha[4] in list(Q)" is apparently False. I think this must be a bu |
2022-07-11 19:35:26 +0100 | asked a question | Color nodes of poset Color nodes of poset I have a poset Q and an element alpha[4] of Q. If I type "alpha[4] in Q", Sage correctly responds " |
2021-01-15 18:18:45 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-01-23 11:47:57 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2017-04-05 01:37:03 +0100 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2013-06-13 17:16:51 +0100 | marked best answer | referencing polynomial variables Note that it is also possible to do this in a genuine |
2013-05-26 19:10:50 +0100 | answered a question | referencing polynomial variables The simplest solution is just to use dictionary arguments for subs. Instead of which throws a SyntaxError, you can write |
2013-04-03 19:12:04 +0100 | asked a question | referencing polynomial variables Suppose I have a polynomial $f$ in the variables $x_1, \dots, x_5$ defined by something like where mylist is some list of integers. Then I can evaluate $f$ by e.g. Question: How do I do this evaluation when $f$ is in $n>>0$ variables? I want to write something like but this isn't a valid argument for subs. This must be some way to coerce this to work. |
2012-11-15 17:53:12 +0100 | answered a question | combinat install The solution was to reinstall sage from source. |
2012-11-15 17:52:12 +0100 | commented question | combinat install Thank you! I reinstalled from source, and now combinat will work for me. |
2012-11-14 15:28:16 +0100 | commented question | combinat install oliver@puter:~$ sage -b main ---------------------------------------------------------- sage: Building and installing modified Sage library files. Installing c_lib g++ -o libcsage.so -shared src/convert.os src/interrupt.os src/memory.os src/mpn_pylong.os src/mpz_pylong.os src/mpz_longlong.os src/stdsage.os src/gmp_globals.os src/ZZ_pylong.os src/ntl_wrap.os -L/home/oliver/sage-5.4-linux-32bit-ubuntu_12.04.1_lts-i686-Linux/local/lib -L/home/oliver/sage-5.4-linux-32bit-ubuntu_12.04.1_lts-i686-Linux/local/lib/python2.7/config -lntl -lpari -lgmp -lpython2.7 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find crti.o: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status scons: *** [libcsage.so] Error 1 Error building c_lib. |
2012-11-14 12:58:24 +0100 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2012-11-12 17:09:43 +0100 | commented question | combinat install The reinstallation of sage is fine, but I am scared to try combinat again without knowing what went wrong the first time. |
2012-11-12 12:29:52 +0100 | asked a question | combinat install I was running sage 5.3 on a lubuntu 12.04 machine. Everything was fine. Then I tried
Now when I try to use sage, it says
Is this a known issue? I am currently reinstalling sage 5.4 and hoping that it will work this time. Please advise. Thanks! UPDATE: I tried it again in 5.4 and got the following error:
|
2012-11-08 12:39:33 +0100 | commented answer | Skew commuting variables Thanks! This is exactly what I needed! |
2012-11-08 12:39:13 +0100 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2012-11-08 12:39:13 +0100 | marked best answer | Skew commuting variables You can use our wrapper for Singular's non-commutative component Plural. In particular, you can create a G-algebra for this ring as follows: |
2012-11-08 12:39:11 +0100 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2012-11-08 07:01:08 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2012-11-07 18:22:17 +0100 | asked a question | Skew commuting variables I want to work in the ring I seems like FreeAlgebraQuotient is the thing to use, but I am not sure how. In the documentation for FreeAlgebraQuotient, the algebras are 4-dimensional as modules over QQ. However in my application, the algebra is infinite-dimensional as a module, so I can't write down the matrices for the action of the generators. Is there another way to obtain this ring? Thanks. |