2016-12-29 03:39:56 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-04-15 14:58:49 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 17:09:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 17:09:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 17:09:00 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 03:14:29 +0200 | marked best answer | How to plot a zoomed part in a matplotlib figure in sage? Hi, I'm trying to zoom one part of my figure in Matplotlib. In the Matplotlib-Galery, I found this nice example using mpl_toolkits.axes_grid.inset_locator http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/plo... The result is http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/plo... which is pretty much what I need. Does anybody know how to do this in sage? I didn't manage to use this function in sage. (In fact, I even didn't find it) Thanks! |
2014-06-29 03:12:44 +0200 | marked best answer | Prevent sage from simplifying Hi, When I enter a symbolic equation in sage, it always displays it simplified and not as I typed it in. Is there a way to make sage to keep the equation in that form I typed it? Thanks, twk |
2013-05-09 08:08:37 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-08-13 06:02:23 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-07-13 10:19:39 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2012-03-15 16:19:02 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2012-02-07 07:20:05 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2011-07-26 12:40:25 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2011-05-20 17:12:23 +0200 | commented answer | Solve system of equations with additional conditions in sage Would there be a more fast and simple solution if I could make all variables to integers? Just noticed, that this wouldn't be a big problem for my application. |
2011-05-20 17:07:26 +0200 | commented answer | Solve system of equations with additional conditions in sage Hi, thanks for this tricky approach - It calculates now - I'm curious about the results. Doesn't matter too much that it takes a while - I hope I will get some results by tomorrow.. |
2011-05-20 14:08:14 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2011-05-19 02:10:39 +0200 | commented answer | Solve system of equations with additional conditions in sage Hi, with changing e to d (had been my fault), I get some results that are useful for me. But still, solve does ignore the 'integer' asumption. Is there maybe an option to declare that all variables must be integers? |
2011-05-19 01:07:31 +0200 | commented question | Solve system of equations with additional conditions in sage Hi, sorry- my mistake - I wrote eq2 = b == k * e where eq2 = b == k * d should stand. Does it make more sense for you this way? Thanks, Tobi |
2011-05-18 18:23:57 +0200 | commented answer | Prevent sage from simplifying Hi, sorry for answering so late. It's very hard to type equations this way or am I wrong? This can basically be a solution but I've to to test it. Thanks for this suggestion! |
2011-05-18 18:21:55 +0200 | marked best answer | Prevent sage from simplifying Update: The following is now possible, and should work in Sage 4.6, thanks to Burcin: More documentation can be found in each symbolic function, and |
2011-05-18 18:21:10 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2011-05-18 17:56:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2011-05-18 17:54:35 +0200 | asked a question | Solve system of equations with additional conditions in sage Hi Sage users, I've got a system of equations like the following example:
with n and k must be integers. for the other variables, there are additional conditions like
I want to get all solutions of this system where n and k are integers. Is there a way to find these with sage? Would be great to get any possible hint to do this! Thanks for your suggestions, Tobi |
2011-04-26 05:30:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2011-02-10 04:36:17 +0200 | answered a question | Prevent sage from simplifying Hi, any updates on this topic? I still think, that this is a big disadvantage in symbolic calculations in sage! |
2011-02-10 04:34:43 +0200 | marked best answer | Execute notebook sessions without storing it at the server
|
2011-02-10 04:34:28 +0200 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2011-02-10 04:32:29 +0200 | asked a question | Matplotlib navigation constrained pan or keybindings Hi, is it possible to have constrained panning or keybindings to move right or left using the qt4Agg backend? Thanks for your suggestions, Tobi |
2011-01-17 13:31:00 +0200 | asked a question | Execute notebook sessions without storing it at the server Hi, is there a possibility to execute notebook sessions that are stored at an external path (without having it stored at the server)? Is it also possible to execute sessions from the command-line and just get the stored outputs and printed outputs? Thanks for your help |
2011-01-16 16:44:24 +0200 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2011-01-03 22:26:42 +0200 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2011-01-03 22:09:58 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2010-11-08 20:18:39 +0200 | received badge | ● Student (source) |