2024-01-16 04:31:12 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2024-01-16 04:31:12 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-11-02 07:56:29 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-11-02 07:56:29 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2023-08-29 04:13:50 +0100 | edited question | Using docbuild on an external package Using docbuild on an external package I am attempting to use docbuild to build Sage-style documentation for a package th |
2023-08-29 03:42:48 +0100 | asked a question | Using docbuild on an external package Using docbuild on an external package I am attempting to use docbuild to build Sage-style documentation for a package th |
2022-12-16 23:39:24 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2022-11-14 22:22:54 +0100 | received badge | ● Taxonomist |
2022-01-18 22:49:28 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2021-07-07 03:34:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-08-25 00:24:15 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-06-23 21:13:24 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-05-01 22:32:35 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-01-31 01:08:50 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-06-27 15:06:22 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-06-26 17:43:24 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-02-10 19:00:06 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2019-01-08 17:43:34 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-01-06 18:16:35 +0100 | answered a question | Using Singular's solve.lib Looking in Again, the elements are still Singular objects, but one (perhaps rudimentary) way to convert them is Perhaps more robust than Note that |
2018-01-06 18:03:29 +0100 | commented answer | Using Singular's solve.lib When I tried |
2018-01-06 16:40:29 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2018-01-06 16:19:46 +0100 | received badge | ● Good Question (source) |
2018-01-06 14:32:22 +0100 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2018-01-06 04:35:56 +0100 | asked a question | Using Singular's solve.lib I am trying to use Singular's at which point the result is stored in a list Alternatively, I tried to use But then Any help in either direction would be greatly appreciated. |
2017-12-12 17:58:49 +0100 | marked best answer | Faster function for working with cosets I would like to get the cosets of a non-normal subgroup and in the documentation for the PermutationGroup_generic.cosets there is a Note: that says
but doesn't mention what these functions are. I was hoping that someone could point me to these functions. If it makes a difference, I want to iterate over a set of coset representatives and it will all be done in a permutation group. |
2017-12-12 04:06:39 +0100 | asked a question | Error when trying to import without sage.all I am trying to import only the Sage functions needed as is done in the Sage source code, but I am running into issues. For example, (running results in (I can post the full traceback if that would be helpful.) Similar things happen for almost any import I try. I was using the Am I missing something? EDIT: I think I get the picture a little better now. The Sage source files aren't meant to be imported in Python, they are meant to be imported into Sage, which presumably runs |
2017-12-08 06:34:33 +0100 | asked a question | Substituting a complex embedding for a number field element Is there a way to take an element of a number field (or a polynomial or a number field) and replace the generator of the field by one of its complex embeddings? For example, something like It's feasible to do this with |
2017-12-02 07:21:59 +0100 | asked a question | Import just one function from .sage file I have a |
2017-08-02 17:25:06 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2017-07-14 00:45:01 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2017-07-02 16:44:02 +0100 | asked a question | Loading a module causes the __name__ == '__main__' block to execute I have a module that can also be run from the command line: When I try to load it in Sage, the main block is executed: The bigger problem is that the main block parses command line arguments and Sage aborts the load with an error because it didn't receive any command line arguments. Is there any way to handle this? I can preparse |
2017-06-27 18:57:59 +0100 | commented question | Accessing GAP's in function through the C Interface Edited to clarify that I wanted to call this from Sage. |
2017-02-13 02:12:31 +0100 | asked a question | Is there a way to relabel the domain of a permutation group? Suppose I have a permutation group on the domain {1,2,3,4,5}, but instead I wanted this permutation group to be on the domain {a,b,c,d,e}. Is there a way to achieve this? Hopefully something like the |
2017-02-06 20:22:46 +0100 | asked a question | How to increase GAP's recursion limit Is there a way to increase the recursion limit of (lib)GAP processes? I am hitting a recursion limit when computing a double coset:
|
2017-02-05 17:24:58 +0100 | asked a question | Accessing GAP's in function through the C Interface Is there a way to access GAP's EDIT: I was wondering how to call this from Sage: How do I test if |
2016-11-29 06:17:42 +0100 | edited answer | using GAP: Group Theory Here is the problem: Just coerce them to GAP: |