2023-10-03 02:25:59 +0100 | marked best answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Let $B$ be a finite dimensional algebra over a field $K$ with dimension $n$ over $K$. Sage can give us a $K$-basis of this algebra that we denote by $e_i$ (i=1,...,n). Here is an example: The structure constants $c_{l,i,j} $ of the algebra $B$ are defined by the condition: $e_i e_j = \sum\limits_{l}^{}{c_{l,i,j} e_l }$. For a list $A=[a_1,...,a_n]$ with field elements $a_i$ define the $n \times n$-matrix $P_A$ by $(P_A)_{i,j}= \sum\limits_{l}^{}{c_{l,i,j} a_l }$.
The background of this question is that this is satisfied precisely when $B$ is a Frobenius algebra, see for example theorem 16.82 in the book "Lectures on Modules and Rings" by Lam. |
2023-10-03 02:25:59 +0100 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2023-10-03 02:03:23 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Thanks again. You might be right but I want a program that works for sure so I want to avoid random things. I tried to m |
2023-10-03 02:02:23 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Thanks again. You might be right but I want a program that works for sure so I want to avoid random things. I tried to m |
2023-10-03 02:00:12 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Thanks again. You might be right but I want a program that works for sure so I want to avoid random things. I tried to m |
2023-10-03 01:59:10 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Thanks again. You might be right but I want a program that works for sure so I want to avoid random things. I tried to m |
2023-10-03 01:49:43 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius I realised that my previous comment might be stupid as calculating such big determinants with variables might take too l |
2023-10-03 01:40:38 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius I realised that my previous comment might be stupid as calculating such big determinants with variables might take too l |
2023-10-03 01:40:04 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Maybe one can view $P_A$ as a matrix with entries in the quotient field of the polynomial ring $K[a_1,a_2,...,a_n]$ and |
2023-10-03 01:22:55 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Thank you very much. Is it possible to take as the entries of $A$ variables $a_i$ so that $det(P_A)$ is a polynomial in |
2023-10-03 01:22:41 +0100 | commented answer | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Thank you very much. Is it possible to take as the entries of $A$ variables $a_i$ so that $P_A$ is a polynomial in the v |
2023-10-03 01:21:38 +0100 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2023-10-02 20:16:30 +0100 | edited question | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Let $B$ be a finite dimensional algebra over a field $K$ with |
2023-10-01 22:29:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2023-10-01 10:32:21 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2023-10-01 03:33:38 +0100 | edited question | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Let $B$ be a finite dimensional algebra over a field $K$ with |
2023-10-01 03:31:02 +0100 | edited question | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Let $B$ be a finite dimensional algebra over a field $K$ with |
2023-10-01 03:30:40 +0100 | asked a question | Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Testing whether a finite dimensional algebra is Frobenius Let $B$ be a finite dimensional algebra over a field $K$ with |
2023-09-01 17:26:00 +0100 | commented answer | Obtaining an unmodified latex output via Sage Thanks, I searched a bit and so far all solutions that work sadly delete the digraph structure and just give a graph som |
2023-09-01 15:46:54 +0100 | commented answer | Obtaining an unmodified latex output via Sage Thanks I searched a bit and so far all solutions that work sadly delete the digraph structure and just give a graph some |
2023-09-01 11:31:33 +0100 | edited question | Obtaining an unmodified latex output via Sage Obtaining an unmodified latex output via Sage I use the following in Sage to obtain latex output of a digraph: G=DiGrap |
2023-09-01 11:23:24 +0100 | asked a question | Obtaining an unmodified latex output via Sage Obtaining an unmodified latex output via Sage I use the following in Sage to obtain latex output of a digraph: G=DiGrap |
2023-08-31 21:29:10 +0100 | commented question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Hmmm, thanks. Im a bit confused right now. I delete the question for now and try to pose a more precise version maybe la |
2023-08-31 21:28:54 +0100 | commented question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Hmmm, Im a bit confused right now. I delete the question for now and try to pose a more precise version maybe later. |
2023-08-31 21:04:42 +0100 | commented question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism It means stable up to isomorphism and taking the opposite orientation. Sorry, I should have said that. |
2023-08-31 21:04:23 +0100 | edited question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Let $G$ be a digraph with underlying graph |
2023-08-31 19:24:20 +0100 | edited question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Let $G$ be a digraph with underlying graph |
2023-08-31 19:23:19 +0100 | edited question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Let $G$ be a digraph with underlying graph |
2023-08-31 19:20:58 +0100 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2023-08-31 19:20:58 +0100 | edited question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Let $G$ be a digraph with underlying graph |
2023-08-31 19:16:18 +0100 | asked a question | Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Checking whether a Dynkin graph is invariant under the canonical automorphism Let $G$ be a digraph with underlying graph |