2020-10-24 07:52:20 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2017-08-18 04:45:23 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-10-24 14:29:05 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-05-24 18:42:19 +0100 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2016-05-24 18:41:57 +0100 | asked a question | Washed out colors when saving plots to file I try to use the but the colors (in particular, the opacities) are washed out. There is no problem right-clicking to save as png from the notebook, but I want to save a bunch of pngs. |
2016-05-23 03:55:20 +0100 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2016-05-23 02:48:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-05-19 18:04:35 +0100 | answered a question | Permutation set acting on another set Maybe something like this... Output: {[3, 1, 2, 4], [1, 3, 4, 2], [2, 4, 3, 1], [4, 2, 1, 3]} |
2016-05-19 05:31:21 +0100 | asked a question | Funny ellipse I am trying to plot an ellipse (using the term loosely). I want the set of points equidistant from the plane defined parametrically by (0, 0, 1) + t(0, 1, 1) + s(1, 1, 1). It is intuitive that this is just the union of two parallel planes. But when I plot, I get an oval...what is wrong? Note that uncommenting to change the vectors gives two planes as expected, furthering my bewilderment. |
2016-05-18 22:04:09 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-05-18 22:04:09 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2016-05-18 22:04:09 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-05-18 22:02:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2016-05-18 22:02:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2016-05-18 22:02:49 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2015-11-14 19:17:35 +0100 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2015-11-10 21:05:38 +0100 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2015-11-10 20:44:38 +0100 | asked a question | Annoying folding behavior SageMath cloud folds my cell content sometimes. That is, it hides the code after generating the content. Sometimes, I can unfold by double-clicking, but not always. Am I missing something? Also, whenever I evaulate a cell in the cloud, my cursor moves to the bottom of all cells. Is there a way to prevent this? |
2015-11-10 20:44:38 +0100 | asked a question | Comments with SageMath Cloud How to comment/uncomment a block of text with SageMath cloud? Apparently, this can be done with the notebook...for now I am just using an external editor. |
2015-06-19 14:12:34 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2015-06-19 14:12:34 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:05:18 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:05:18 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:05:18 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:03:37 +0100 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:03:37 +0100 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2014-06-29 21:03:37 +0100 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2013-09-06 22:54:58 +0100 | asked a question | notebook: localhost 8080 vs 8000 I used Sage v. 5.0 for the first time in a while and couldn't connect to the notebook. I received the message: Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8000. I was still able to use Sage from the command line, but decided to install v. 5.11 to see if that would fix my problem. Does anyone know the reason for this? |
2012-09-20 23:18:07 +0100 | asked a question | Latex formatting for exponential numbers I noticed that tick_formatter = 'latex' fails for very small/large numbers. Does anyone know a solution to this? Thanks in advance, TJ |
2012-09-17 22:28:51 +0100 | asked a question | Precision of find_root Here is a straightforward question: I am wondering about the precision of find_root. Looking into the documentation (I'm using Sage v. 5.0), there is a comment along with one of the examples that the "precision isn't very good on some machines." At the same time, it says that the routine converges unless it throws an error. A post response from William Stein clarifies that the function is passed to SciPy which has double precision. So I'm assuming that there may be a way for more precision on some machines, but that one can always count on having at least this much. |