2023-07-05 14:01:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2023-07-05 14:01:18 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-05-19 17:36:14 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2022-04-04 05:38:15 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-03-09 21:41:32 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-01-27 22:34:30 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-08-24 09:46:50 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2021-03-10 09:57:17 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2021-02-15 21:45:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-10-13 06:23:47 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-10-04 22:33:17 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-10-04 22:33:17 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-08-31 08:58:58 +0200 | asked a question | Can sagetex generate tex files? I'm writing a latex document that will eventually need to be compiled on a machine that does not have sage on it. However, right now I'm using sagetex to write this document. I'm curious if it is somehow possible to generate a latex document with all of the \sage invocations replaced with the corresponding latex code. |
2020-07-13 13:07:54 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-05-13 19:43:57 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-05-08 03:35:08 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-04-23 09:46:45 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2020-04-23 09:46:36 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-04-09 22:54:19 +0200 | asked a question | Can sagetex be configured to read init.sage? I have a lot of useful code stored in |
2020-04-09 22:27:55 +0200 | commented answer | How can I change the location of DOT_SAGE? Ahh, so sage reads environment variables set by my shell? |
2020-04-09 06:35:27 +0200 | asked a question | How can I change the location of DOT_SAGE? The documentation for environment variables used by sage it is mentioned that the default location of How can this location be changed? |
2020-03-09 19:11:29 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-02-07 19:03:40 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2020-02-07 19:03:36 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
2020-02-07 19:03:23 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2020-01-04 15:28:10 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-10-26 13:18:59 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2019-08-27 22:47:29 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-08-27 22:16:52 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-08-27 16:20:26 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2019-08-27 11:40:29 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-06-26 17:43:49 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2019-06-26 17:43:49 +0200 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
2019-01-15 04:47:30 +0200 | asked a question | Why can't I use the sagesilent environment in AtBeginDocument? I'm trying to write a latex My file is However, attempting to use this What's wrong with my |
2018-12-25 11:28:00 +0200 | asked a question | Is it possible to remove the latex parentheses from exponential functions? Consider the block of code It looks like sage is configured to include parentheses in the latex of an exponential function. Is it possible to configure sage to exclude these parentheses? |
2018-12-24 19:20:40 +0200 | marked best answer | Can sage compute the h* vector of a polytope? We can define polytopes in sage with the command Here p is the convex hull of the integer matrix A. I'm curious if we can compute the h* vector of p. Is this possible? Roughly, the h* vector of a convex lattice polytope is constructed as follows. The Ehrhart series can be expressed as a rational function whose numerator is a polynomial. The h* vector of a polytope is the vector of coefficients of this polynomial. I'm aware that sage can compute the ehrhart polynomial of a polytope with I know the command in polymake is Perhaps a more general question would be: can I pass a polytope defined in sage to polymake and can sage read the results of the polymake operation? |
2018-12-24 19:19:35 +0200 | asked a question | Is it possible to customize the default behavior of sagetex? When using sagetex, I want my matrices to have square brackets and my vectors to have angled brackets. Hence, the first thing I do after This is very annoying. Is it possible to set sagetex up to do this by default? |
2018-05-02 16:11:09 +0200 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2018-05-02 15:27:48 +0200 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
2018-05-02 15:10:12 +0200 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |