Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

Unable to simplify variable completly

In solving the following hicksian demands in this problem and so far the proceedure works great.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b 
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve((p1/p2).subs(step1)==p1/p2, x1)
good2step3 = solve((U/R).subs(step2).log().log_expand()==0, x2)
good1step4=solve(step2[0].subs(good2step3).canonicalize_radical(),x1)

however I note that I dont get such a clean result for good2step3, though algebraically correct its not completely simplified. I've tried simplify_rational() and simplify_log but that ends up ruining my clean solution for x1 in good1step4.

Is there more I can do to clean up my solutions?

Unable to simplify variable completly

In solving the following hicksian demands in this problem and so far the proceedure works great.

x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R= var('x1, x2, l, p1, p2, a, b,  R')
U = x1^a*x2^b 
m = p1*x1+p2*x2;
L = m+ l * (R-U);
dLdx = L.diff(x1);
dLdy = L.diff(x2);
dLdl = L.diff(l);
step1=solve([dLdx == 0, dLdy == 0, dLdl == 0], p1, p2, R)
step2=solve((p1/p2).subs(step1)==p1/p2, x1)
good2step3 = solve((U/R).subs(step2).log().log_expand()==0, x2)
good1step4=solve(step2[0].subs(good2step3).canonicalize_radical(),x1)

however I note that I dont get such a clean result for good2step3, though algebraically correct its not completely simplified. I've tried simplify_rational() and simplify_log but that ends up ruining my clean solution for x1 in good1step4.

Is there more I can do to clean up my solutions?