# solve x*exp(x)==0 and x*exp(-x)==0

```
sage: solve(x*exp(x)==0,x)
[x == 0, e^x == 0]
```

but

```
sage: solve(x*exp(-x)==0,x)
[x == 0]
```

How can i avoid the e^x==0 in the solutionlist?

Thanks for help.

solve x*exp(x)==0 and x*exp(-x)==0

```
sage: solve(x*exp(x)==0,x)
[x == 0, e^x == 0]
```

but

```
sage: solve(x*exp(-x)==0,x)
[x == 0]
```

How can i avoid the e^x==0 in the solutionlist?

Thanks for help.

0

This should be fixed in Sage 5.0, because of Trac 10682. Compare the following (old and new versions of Maxima):

```
Maxima 5.23.2 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp ECL 11.1.1
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i1) solve(x*%e^x=0,x);
x
(%o1) [x = 0, %e = 0]
Maxima 5.26.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp SBCL 1.0.24
Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING.
Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter.
The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information.
(%i2) solve(x*%e^x=0,x);
(%o2) [x = 0]
```

Asked: **
2012-03-12 02:06:03 -0500
**

Seen: **304 times**

Last updated: **Mar 12 '12**

Can someone help in finding code for solve function

Method for solving a large system of under-determined equations?

Cannot solve equation with two radical terms

unable to numerically solve an equation (basic question)

What is the best way to return only real solutions?

How to properly declare indeterminates so that they exist in the coefficient ring.

Formatting inequalities display

Solve equation 1/3*x + sin(2*x)==1

Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.

In Maxima 5.26.0 both solutions are [x=0] so I hope the problem will vanish soon

Huh, identical timings! Yes, #10682 should take care of it, and has positive review.