Why are Notebook docs different from CLI docs? What is Namespace "Interactive"?

asked 2010-09-10 00:07:04 +0100

ccanonc
577 ●21 ●31 ●45

updated 2011-04-28 16:04:27 +0100

Kelvin Li
503 ●5 ●12 ●17

The sage terminal returns the following, but the notebook interface omits the "Base Class", "String Form", "Namespace", and "Length":

sage: NaN?
Type: Expression
Base Class: type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'
String Form: NaN
Namespace: Interactive
Length: 0
File: /SAGE_DIR/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/categories/commutative_rings.py
Definition: NaN(self, *args, **kwds)
Docstring:
x.__init__(...) initializes x; see x.__class__.__doc__ for signature

answered 2010-09-10 02:03:42 +0100

John Palmieri

8876 ●19 ●73 ●192 http://www.math.washin...

The notebook docs are different from the CLI docs because they're prepared differently. The command-line docs are prepared using code from the file devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py, which is then fed into ipython, and I think ipython adds the extra fields "Base Class", etc. The notebook docs are prepared using similar code, plus code from the notebook: see local/lib/python/site-packages/sagenb-.../sagenb/misc/support.py. This takes care of the nice formatting, the color, etc. It doesn't use ipython, though, so those fields are missing.

edit flag offensive delete link

Comments

It would be nice if they were consistent as far as content. The ipython evaluation is more informative.

ccanonc ( 2010-09-10 12:32:11 +0100 )edit

add a comment

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Why are Notebook docs different from CLI docs? What is Namespace "Interactive"?

1 Answer

Comments

Your Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Why are Notebook docs different from CLI docs? What is Namespace "Interactive"? edit

1 Answer

Comments

Your Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Related questions

Why are Notebook docs different from CLI docs? What is Namespace "Interactive"?