Ask Your Question

What is a 'CoxeterGroup'?

asked 2018-09-06 12:27:53 +0100

RegularUser gravatar image

Hi, I'm trying to implement a certain Coxeter group in Sage, for the purpose of building the corresponding Iwahori-Hecke algebra over it using sage.algebras.iwahori_hecke_algebra.IwahoriHeckeAlgebra. In the documentation of the constructor of this class, it says that it takes a "Coxeter group" as an argument. However, Coxeter groups as generated by sage.combinat.root_system.coxeter_group.CoxeterGroup aren't actually instances of a common superclass.

Afaict, the methods of IwahoriHeckeAlgebra simply implicitly assume the existence of certain instance methods (like W.is_finite or W.from_reduced_word), probably also with some implicitly assumed semantics of said methods. So, my question is whether the behaviour of being a "Coxeter group" are actually anywhere formally documented, or whether I'm stuck piecing together the required methods & semantics through trial and error.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete



You may want to look at src/sage/groups/matrix_gps/ and src/sage/categories/ and src/sage/categories/examples/

FrédéricC gravatar imageFrédéricC ( 2018-09-06 18:01:28 +0100 )edit

2 Answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2018-09-17 15:09:37 +0100

RegularUser gravatar image

updated 2018-09-17 15:11:37 +0100

Okay, here are the minimal steps that you need to take (for a complete working example, see here):

Create a class representing the group

This class should look as follows:

class MyCoxeterGroup(UniqueRepresentation, FinitelyGeneratedMatrixGroup_generic):
    Element = MyCoxeterGroupElement
    def index_set(self):
    def simple_reflection(self, i):
    def is_finite(self):
    def __repr__(self):
    def __contains__(self, x):
    def coxeter_matrix(self):

The requirements on the semantics of these methods are implicit, but can be gathered quite easily from the source file of sage.categories.coxeter_groups and other related ones. Subclassing from FinitelyGeneratedMatrixGroup_generic isn't strictly necessary, but if your Coxeter group has anything to do with matrices, you probably want to subclass from it.

Subclassing from UniqueRepresentation is necessary, at least if you plan on building the corresponding Iwahori-Hecke algebra over it. The reason for this is that if you don't subclass from UniqueRepresentation, the object returned by

CombinatorialFreeModule(ZZ, W).basis().keys()

(given that W is an instance of MyCoxeterGroup) will not be an instance of MyCoxeterGroup. For this reason, also the following command will fail

IwahoriHeckeAlgebra(W, 0, 0, ZZ).T().algebra_generators()

I don't exactly know how subclassing from UniqueRepresentation fixes that problem, but it seems to have to do with the magic that Sage uses when dynamically creating classes.

Create a class representing elements of the group

This should look like this:

class MyCoxeterGroupElement(MatrixGroupElement_generic):
    def __eq__(self, other):
    def __mul__(self, other):
    def has_left_descent(self, i):

I won't go into all details here, but __eq__ should be the equality test for elements of your group, __mul__ should at least implement multiplication of two instances of type MyCoxeterGroupElement, and has_left_descent should for a given index i (which should be one of the elements returned by MyCoxeterGroup.index_set) returned a boolean (!) specifying whether the simple reflection corresponding to i lies in the left descent set of the element in question (self). In other words, has_left_descent(self, i) should evaluate to True iff l(s_i w) < l(w).

Note that it's really important that has_left_descent returns a boolean and not a more general truth object, as the default implementation of has_descent will make a test of the form

`has_left_descent(i) != False`

which can evaluate to True even if has_left_descent(i) is a truth object representing falsehood.

edit flag offensive delete link more

answered 2018-09-06 22:33:30 +0100

dan_fulea gravatar image

Here are some equivalent ways to introduce the Iwahori-Hecke algebra, in this particular example for the type $A_3$.

sage: R.<q> = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: Q = q^2
sage: IHA1 = IwahoriHeckeAlgebra( 'A3', Q )
sage: IHA2 = IwahoriHeckeAlgebra( RootSystem('A3'), Q )
sage: IHA3 = IwahoriHeckeAlgebra( CoxeterGroup( 'A3' ), Q )
sage: IHA1 == IHA2
sage: IHA1 == IHA3

sage: T = IHA1.T()
sage: [ (T[k]-Q)*(T[k]+1) for k in (1,2,3) ]
[0, 0, 0]
sage: T1, T2, T3 = T.algebra_generators()
sage: [ (Tk-Q)*(Tk+1) for Tk in (T1,T2,T3) ]
[0, 0, 0]
sage: T2*T1*T2
sage: T1*T2*T1

I also tried

sage: IHA4 = IwahoriHeckeAlgebra( WeylGroup('A3'), Q )
sage: IHA1 == IHA4

sage: IHA1 = IwahoriHeckeAlgebra( 'A3', Q )
sage: IHA5 = IwahoriHeckeAlgebra( CartanType('A3'), Q )
sage: IHA1 == IHA5

The equality with IHA4 fails maybe for reasons of internal representation. But one can also work in IHA4.

sage: TT = IHA4.T()
sage: TT[1]^2
-(1-q^2)*T[1] + q^2
sage: TT[1]*TT[2]*TT[1] - TT[2]*TT[1]*TT[2]

If the needed research theme / application points to a Coxeter group not listed among the $A,B,C,D,E,F,\dots$ types, then we need to know the Coxeter group in the original post. (How it is constructed, or at least mathematically defined.)

edit flag offensive delete link more


This does not seem to answer my question.

RegularUser gravatar imageRegularUser ( 2018-09-07 15:33:59 +0100 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2018-09-06 12:27:53 +0100

Seen: 279 times

Last updated: Sep 17 '18