Ask Your Question

Algorithm for finding a defining polynomial for an unramified extension?

asked 2018-06-12 15:38:01 -0500

mathjain gravatar image

updated 2018-06-12 17:35:22 -0500

slelievre gravatar image

I wanted to know by what algorithm sage finds a defining polynomial of an unramified extension of p-adic numbers?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2018-06-13 05:00:51 -0500

j.c. gravatar image

The short answer is that this will depend on the way you defined your unramified extension. If, for instance, you defined it using Zq or Qq applied to $p^n$ for small $p,n$ then what is returned is likely to be a Conway polynomial from a database included in SageMath based on the work of Frank Lübeck.

If there's some other specific case you're interested in, perhaps you can edit your question to include the code that constructs that particular extension.

What follows is "the long answer", or how I found this out, starting from knowing essentially nothing about algebraic number theory or any of SageMath's ANT functionality. Hopefully the description of the steps I took in diving into SageMath's source code will be helpful for you in finding the answers to any similar questions you might have in the future.

Suppose we've defined R as follows:

R.<a> = Zq(1024)

Then we can type


to look at the docstring for this particular function.

The resulting output, while somewhat helpful, does not explain what algorithm SageMath is using to compute it. However, it does contain a line pointing to the source code, something like:

File: /Applications/SageMath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/padics/

Now, it's a bit more convenient to look at this file online in e.g. the github mirror of the SageMath source code. I've linked to the specific line where the definition of defining_polynomial() is here.

In this case, it appears that this code simply returns _given_poly, which is defined in the class pAdicExtensionGeneric as one of the parameters to the class constructor. We never called this directly above; instead, we called Zq, so we should look for the code there.

We find that Zq is defined in sage/rings/padics/, specifically here. In the documentation to Zq, we find that either the polynomial can be specified by hand, or:

By default, the polynomial chosen is the standard lift of the generator chosen for $\mathbb{F}_q$.

In fact, we could have skipped some of the code-diving above as SageMath's reference site has a thematic tutorial on p-adics, see the documentation of Zq on the second page.

However, to find the details of the "generator chosen for $\mathbb{F}_q$", we must return to the code:

The code implementing this can be found here, which uses the modulus() function in the FiniteField class in sage/rings/finite_rings/

Looking at the relevant part of that code, we see that modulus() is constructed from R.irreducible_element(n) where R = PolynomialRing(FiniteField(p), 'x') and where $p,n$ are $2,10$ respectively because the order we chose above was 1024.

If we look at the code for the class PolynomialRing, we find that its definition is split into different cases, and the relevant one here is PolynomialRing_dense_mod_p. The function irreducible_element() is defined within and we see that the default polynomial returned in this case comes from sage/rings/finite_rings/ (here), which in turn relies on sage/databases/ (here), where we finally find the information that the database comes from Frank Lübeck's tables.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools


Asked: 2018-06-12 15:38:01 -0500

Seen: 27 times

Last updated: Jun 13