Ask Your Question

Elliptic Curves and Isogenies in Sage

asked 2018-01-15 18:43:52 +0200

ninho gravatar image

updated 2018-01-15 21:13:07 +0200

I have the following Sage code which throws an error:

p = 10354717741769305252977768237866805321427389645549071170116189679054678940682478846502882896561066713624553211618840202385203911976522554393044160468771151816976706840078913334358399730952774926980235086850991501872665651576831
Fp = GF(p)
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Fp)
# The quadratic extension via x^2 + 1 since p = 3 mod 4
Fp2 = Fp.extension(x^2 + 1, 'i')

# E0 is the starting curve E0/Fp2: y^2=x^3+x (the A=0 Montgomery curve)
E0 = EllipticCurve(Fp2, [1,0])
assert E0.is_supersingular()

phiP = E0([params[2], params[3]])
print "phiP =", phiP
phiQ = E0([-params[2], I*params[3]])
print "phiQ =", phiQ

param is a list of some big values. The phiP part executes sucessfully, and I get the correct values that I need, but the next line phiQ, throws and error. I believe because I want to have an imaginary number and multiply by I. The error that it throws is: TypeError: positive characteristic not allowed in symbolic computations . Any ideas what the problem is and how to workaround it?

Additionally, I also have a problem with the EllipcticCurveIsogeny function. Using the above prime and fields, I have something like this:

E = EllipticCurve(Fp2, [1,0])
ker = x^3 + 10354717741769305252977768237866805321427389645549071170116189679054678940682478846502882896561066713624553211618840202385203911976522554393044160468771151816976706840078913334358399730952774926980235086850991501872665651576829*x^2 + x
phi = EllipticCurveIsogeny(E, ker)

But, this throws also an error, the error is: NotImplementedError: For basic Kohel's algorithm, if the kernel degree is even then the kernel must be contained in the two torsion.. Any idea how to call the isogeny function using a kernel?


params = [
edit retag flag offensive close merge delete


without the params list it is impossible for us to reproduce.

Does the first problem also shows up if you use smaller numbers?

vdelecroix gravatar imagevdelecroix ( 2018-01-15 21:04:06 +0200 )edit

Check the edit for the params.

ninho gravatar imageninho ( 2018-01-15 21:13:17 +0200 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2018-01-16 01:29:08 +0200

dan_fulea gravatar image

Usually, when using the constructor for a point of an elliptic curve E, the point should have components living in the field of coefficients of E. If not, sage tries to convert. In our case, the first conversion works, the second conversion fails. To fix this, use instead of I the root of $-1$ that exists in the field with $p^2$ elements. I will use j instead of $i$ and/or $I$. (So there is no need to restart sage...)

The second error comes from the fact that the polynomial is $x(x-1)^2$. Using $x(x-1)$ instead also fails. I tried to guess which is the isogeny to be used, using instead an explicit point $P_4(1,\sqrt2)$, which is $4$--torsion.

The following code shows the solution in a decent case.

F = GF(127)
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Fp)
K.<j> = F.extension( x^2 + 1 )

E0 = EllipticCurve( K, [1,0] )
assert E0.is_supersingular()

params = ( None, None, 9, 22 )

phiP = E0( [ params[2],   params[3]] )
print "phiP =", phiP

phiQ = E0( [-params[2], j*params[3]] )
print "phiQ =", phiQ

E   = EllipticCurve( K, [1,0] )
P4  = E( ( 1, sqrt(F(2)) ) )
phi = EllipticCurveIsogeny(E, P4)
print "phi is:\n%s\n" % phi
print "phi has the kernel polynomial %s" % phi.kernel_polynomial().factor()

The prints are, after a slight manual rearrangement:

phiP = (9 : 22 : 1)
phiQ = (118 : 22*j : 1)
phi is:
Isogeny of degree 4 
  from Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + x 
    over Finite Field in j of size 127^2 
  to Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + 83*x + 15 
    over Finite Field in j of size 127^2

phi has the kernel polynomial x * (x + 126)

Note that $P_4$ is a point of order four, and the degree of $\phi$ is also four.

sage: P4.order()

The code can be now easily adapted to work over the more complicated posted situation.

edit flag offensive delete link more


Thank you for the good and clear answer. I have a question about the second part. The above code that I have posted is just an excerpt, but I'm executing the EllipticCurveIsogeny function inside a for loop for many iterations, where I also perform some calculations to get the kernel polynomial for each of the iterations. So, a different kernel polynomial is used in every iteration. Is there a way to get the explicit point from the kernel polynomial in Sage? So that I can convert the polynomial that I calculate at every iteration to an explicit point and use it in the isogeny function, seeing that using a kernel polynomial does not quite work.

ninho gravatar imageninho ( 2018-01-16 11:22:35 +0200 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2018-01-15 18:43:52 +0200

Seen: 1,249 times

Last updated: Jan 16 '18