Ask Your Question
0

Defining AES MixColumns in Sage

asked 2017-12-16 14:27:52 -0600

msdousti gravatar image

AES is a famous cipher. It has an operation called MixColumns (See Wikipedia entry Rijndael MixColumns) where operations take place over finite fields.

Actually, there's a specific polynomial $a(x) = a_3x^{3}+a_2x^{2}+a_1x+a_0$ whose coefficients belong to $GF(2^8)$. MixColumns is defined between $a(x)$ and any polynomial $b(x) = b_{3}x^{3}+b_{2}x^{2}+b_{1}x+b_{0}$ (whose coefficients belong to $GF(2^8)$ as well): It first multiplies $a(x)$ by $b(x)$ (where the algebraic rules between coefficients are governed by $GF(2^8)$), and then computes the remainder modulo $x^4 + 1$.

I tried to mimic the operations in Sage as follows:

R.<x> = PolynomialRing(GF(2), 'x')
S.<y> = QuotientRing(R, R.ideal(x^8+x^4+x^3+x+1))
T.<z> = QuotientRing(S, S.ideal(y^4+1))

But Sage displays an error on the last line. The error seems to be originating from the introduction of z. If I replace the last line with, say, T = QuotientRing(S, S.ideal(y^4+1)), the error goes away. Yet this is not what I intended.

Furthermore, the command S.ideal(y^4+1) outputs:

Principal ideal (1) of Univariate Quotient Polynomial Ring in y over Finite Field of size 2 with modulus x^8 + x^4 + x^3 + x + 1

I don't understand why its is the principal ideal (1) rather than the principal ideal (y^4+1).

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2017-12-16 15:05:15 -0600

vdelecroix gravatar image

updated 2017-12-17 03:59:18 -0600

With your code S = GF(256) is a field and y its generator

sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(GF(2), 'x')
sage: S.<y> = QuotientRing(R, R.ideal(x^8+x^4+x^3+x+1))
sage: S.is_field()
True
sage: S.cardinality()
256
sage: y^8 + y^4 + y^3 + y + 1      # defining polynomial
0

In particular

sage: S.ideal(1) == S.ideal(y) == S.ideal(y^4 + 1)
True

What you want to consider is a different object, namely GF(256)[y], and for that you need to construct a polynomial ring over GF(256). The construction R.<x> in Sage does not build a polynomial ring but simply assign to x the generator of R.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thanks a lot. Could you please answer the first part, too: ln short, how can I define $GF(256)[x] / \langle x^4 + 1 \rangle$ in Sage? I mean, as stated in the question, addition and multiplication of polynomials with coefficients in $GF(256)$ modulo $x^4+1$.

msdousti gravatar imagemsdousti ( 2017-12-16 21:22:15 -0600 )edit

I tried to be clearer.

vdelecroix gravatar imagevdelecroix ( 2017-12-17 03:58:02 -0600 )edit

Thanks again. Let me just confirm my understanding: Sage does not provide a way for defining $GF(256)[x] / \langle x^4 + 1 \rangle$, right?

msdousti gravatar imagemsdousti ( 2017-12-17 04:55:40 -0600 )edit

What's wrong with

sage: R.<x> = PolynomialRing(GF(256), 'x')
sage: R.quotient(x^4 + 1)
Univariate Quotient Polynomial Ring in xbar over Finite Field in z8 of size 2^8 with modulus x^4 + 1
vdelecroix gravatar imagevdelecroix ( 2017-12-18 18:54:53 -0600 )edit

It must work, but it does not (to my surprise). In your definition, $R$ is the ring of polynomials with coefficients over $GF(256)$, but sage treats it as the ring of polynomials with coefficients over $GF(2)$! Just enter something like 5*x in sage, and it interprets this polynomial as x. Or enter x+x, and sage outputs 0.

msdousti gravatar imagemsdousti ( 2017-12-19 14:36:46 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2017-12-16 14:27:52 -0600

Seen: 95 times

Last updated: Dec 17 '17