I want to compute the value of hypergeometric 2F1 like this
a=1/3; b=2/3; c=5/6; x=27/32
print n(hypergeometric([2,1],[a,b,c],x)
Sagemath answered 16.9608452387059. But this should be 8/5=1.60000000. All the other numerical values are also unreliable.
I hope this will be fixed in the next version.
Just a matter of syntax (read the doc). You do not need to give [2,1] as parameters, only the actual parameters of the 2F1.
sage: a=1/3; b=2/3; c=5/6; x=27/32
sage: v=hypergeometric([a,b],[c],x)
sage: v.hypergeometric_simplify()
1/5*5^(11/12)*3^(1/4)*assoc_legendre_p(-2/3, 1/6, -11/16)*gamma(5/6)
sage: v.n()
1.60000000000000
So the simplification is not perfect.
Indeed
sage: QQ(v)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: unable to convert hypergeometric((1/3, 2/3), (5/6,), 27/32) to a rational
Asked: 2016-01-31 09:31:56 +0100
Seen: 628 times
Last updated: Feb 18 '16
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
Where does your supposed "right answer" come from ?
The special value of the hypergeometric 2F1 can be found in http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html (this page) or maybe its reference. By the way, 8/6 in my posting is typo. Correctly, this is 8/5.