ASKSAGE: Sage Q&A Forum - RSS feedhttps://ask.sagemath.org/questions/Q&A Forum for SageenCopyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license.Wed, 07 Apr 2021 20:09:41 +0200Is there a way to define a submanifold of a Euclidean space by providing a list of implicit constraints, instead of by declaring a separate manifold and explicitly defining the embedding?https://ask.sagemath.org/question/56534/is-there-a-way-to-define-a-submanifold-of-a-euclidean-space-by-providing-a-list-of-implicit-constraints-instead-of-by-declaring-a-separate-manifold/**Reasons for asking:** My ultimate goal is to be able to integrate vector and form fields on surfaces defined by constraints in a 3D Euclidean space. A simple example would be the sphere (x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = R^2). perfectly_oddWed, 07 Apr 2021 20:09:41 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/56534/