ASKSAGE: Sage Q&A Forum - Individual question feedhttp://ask.sagemath.org/questions/Q&A Forum for SageenCopyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license.Tue, 25 Dec 2018 05:27:14 -0600generate multiple Vars and vectors with these Varshttp://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/Hi
this exercise comes from a MOOC course that has just ended
EDX.org , MITx: 6.431x Probability - The Science of Uncertainty and Data
![image description](/upfiles/15457260593779659.png)
forget()
var('pi_1 pi_2 pi_3 pi_4 pi_5 pi_6 pi_7 pi_8 pi_9')
# matrix of the Markov's Chain
m = matrix([ \
[1/3 , 5/9 , 0 , 0 , 1/9 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 2/3 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 1/3 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 1/2 , 1/4 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1/4 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 3/4 , 1/4 , 0 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 2/3 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 2/3 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1/3 ] \
])
v=vector([pi_1,pi_2,pi_3,pi_4,pi_5,pi_6,pi_7,pi_8,pi_9])
#Assuming that the Markov chain is initially in state 2 (i.e., X0=2),
# what is the probability that the chain eventually reaches state 7?
#################################
# brute force
#x_0=2
v_s=vector([0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0])
#v_s=vector([0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0])
V_r=v_s*m^110
show(V_r[6].n())
#################################
# smart way
eqT=[]
for i in range(0,len(v)):
eqT.append(m[i]*v==v[i])
show(eqT[2])
show(eqT[3])
S=solve([eqT[2],eqT[3],pi_7==1,pi_8==0],pi_3,pi_4,pi_7,pi_8)
show(S)
show("probability that the chain eventually reaches state 7 : ",S[0][0])
I would like to generate the variables, and the vector automaticaly:
kind of:
dimM=m.dimensions()[1]
varStr=''
for i in range(0,dimM):
#varStr=varStr+ ' a_'+str(i+1)
varStr=varStr+ ' a_'+str(i)
show(varStr)
var(varStr)
R = PolynomialRing(QQ, dimM, 'a_')
v= vector(R,dimM, R.gens())
show(m)
show(v)
eqT=[]
for i in range(0,len(v)):
show(m[i]*v==v[i])
eqT.append(m[i]*v==v[i])
#show(eqT)
but unfortunately this code just above for generating variables and vector automaticaly does not work
Tue, 25 Dec 2018 02:26:10 -0600http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/Answer by rburing for <p>Hi </p>
<p>this exercise comes from a MOOC course that has just ended
<a href="http://EDX.org">EDX.org</a> , MITx: 6.431x Probability - The Science of Uncertainty and Data</p>
<p><img alt="image description" src="/upfiles/15457260593779659.png"></p>
<pre><code>forget()
var('pi_1 pi_2 pi_3 pi_4 pi_5 pi_6 pi_7 pi_8 pi_9')
# matrix of the Markov's Chain
m = matrix([ \
[1/3 , 5/9 , 0 , 0 , 1/9 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 2/3 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 1/3 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 1/2 , 1/4 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1/4 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 3/4 , 1/4 , 0 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 2/3 , 1/3 , 0 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 ], \
[ 0 , 0 , 2/3 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1/3 ] \
])
v=vector([pi_1,pi_2,pi_3,pi_4,pi_5,pi_6,pi_7,pi_8,pi_9])
#Assuming that the Markov chain is initially in state 2 (i.e., X0=2),
# what is the probability that the chain eventually reaches state 7?
#################################
# brute force
#x_0=2
v_s=vector([0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0])
#v_s=vector([0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0])
V_r=v_s*m^110
show(V_r[6].n())
#################################
# smart way
eqT=[]
for i in range(0,len(v)):
eqT.append(m[i]*v==v[i])
show(eqT[2])
show(eqT[3])
S=solve([eqT[2],eqT[3],pi_7==1,pi_8==0],pi_3,pi_4,pi_7,pi_8)
show(S)
show("probability that the chain eventually reaches state 7 : ",S[0][0])
</code></pre>
<p>I would like to generate the variables, and the vector automaticaly:
kind of:</p>
<pre><code>dimM=m.dimensions()[1]
varStr=''
for i in range(0,dimM):
#varStr=varStr+ ' a_'+str(i+1)
varStr=varStr+ ' a_'+str(i)
show(varStr)
var(varStr)
R = PolynomialRing(QQ, dimM, 'a_')
v= vector(R,dimM, R.gens())
show(m)
show(v)
eqT=[]
for i in range(0,len(v)):
show(m[i]*v==v[i])
eqT.append(m[i]*v==v[i])
#show(eqT)
</code></pre>
<p>but unfortunately this code just above for generating variables and vector automaticaly does not work</p>
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?answer=44775#post-id-44775I can't run the code right now (and you didn't include the output / the actual problem). The problem is with generating the equations, yes? The point is that equality testing in the polynomial ring `R` will give a yes or no answer, instead of the symbolic (unevaluated) equality that you want. To get the symbolic equality, convert to the symbolic ring `SR` beforehand. I guess it would be `SR(m[i]*v) == SR(v[i])`. Probably you can also avoid using the symbolic ring, but that is a separate story.Tue, 25 Dec 2018 02:52:50 -0600http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?answer=44775#post-id-44775Comment by ortollj for <p>I can't run the code right now (and you didn't include the output / the actual problem). The problem is with generating the equations, yes? The point is that equality testing in the polynomial ring <code>R</code> will give a yes or no answer, instead of the symbolic (unevaluated) equality that you want. To get the symbolic equality, convert to the symbolic ring <code>SR</code> beforehand. I guess it would be <code>SR(m[i]*v) == SR(v[i])</code>. Probably you can also avoid using the symbolic ring, but that is a separate story.</p>
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44781#post-id-44781ok, thank you slelievreTue, 25 Dec 2018 05:27:14 -0600http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44781#post-id-44781Comment by slelievre for <p>I can't run the code right now (and you didn't include the output / the actual problem). The problem is with generating the equations, yes? The point is that equality testing in the polynomial ring <code>R</code> will give a yes or no answer, instead of the symbolic (unevaluated) equality that you want. To get the symbolic equality, convert to the symbolic ring <code>SR</code> beforehand. I guess it would be <code>SR(m[i]*v) == SR(v[i])</code>. Probably you can also avoid using the symbolic ring, but that is a separate story.</p>
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44780#post-id-44780@ortolij - i converted @rburing's comment into an answer.Tue, 25 Dec 2018 05:21:17 -0600http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44780#post-id-44780Comment by ortollj for <p>I can't run the code right now (and you didn't include the output / the actual problem). The problem is with generating the equations, yes? The point is that equality testing in the polynomial ring <code>R</code> will give a yes or no answer, instead of the symbolic (unevaluated) equality that you want. To get the symbolic equality, convert to the symbolic ring <code>SR</code> beforehand. I guess it would be <code>SR(m[i]*v) == SR(v[i])</code>. Probably you can also avoid using the symbolic ring, but that is a separate story.</p>
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44779#post-id-44779how I can say you give the answer,(because you write your answer in the comment part of the postTue, 25 Dec 2018 05:17:30 -0600http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44779#post-id-44779Comment by ortollj for <p>I can't run the code right now (and you didn't include the output / the actual problem). The problem is with generating the equations, yes? The point is that equality testing in the polynomial ring <code>R</code> will give a yes or no answer, instead of the symbolic (unevaluated) equality that you want. To get the symbolic equality, convert to the symbolic ring <code>SR</code> beforehand. I guess it would be <code>SR(m[i]*v) == SR(v[i])</code>. Probably you can also avoid using the symbolic ring, but that is a separate story.</p>
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44778#post-id-44778thank you rburing it is ok using SR():
for i in range(0,len(v)):
eqT.append(SR(m[i]*v)==SR(v[i]))
show(eqT)Tue, 25 Dec 2018 05:12:26 -0600http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44778#post-id-44778Comment by ortollj for <p>I can't run the code right now (and you didn't include the output / the actual problem). The problem is with generating the equations, yes? The point is that equality testing in the polynomial ring <code>R</code> will give a yes or no answer, instead of the symbolic (unevaluated) equality that you want. To get the symbolic equality, convert to the symbolic ring <code>SR</code> beforehand. I guess it would be <code>SR(m[i]*v) == SR(v[i])</code>. Probably you can also avoid using the symbolic ring, but that is a separate story.</p>
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44776#post-id-44776which code does not work ?, for me the first code is ok and gives the good anwser. the second code is about generating n variables (a_i or pi_i ) i :1 to n and vector with theses variables.
in order to write only the matrix of size n x n, and to generate the variables and the vector automatically.
the question of the problem is in the first code:Tue, 25 Dec 2018 03:12:36 -0600http://ask.sagemath.org/question/44774/generate-multiple-vars-and-vectors-with-these-vars/?comment=44776#post-id-44776