ASKSAGE: Sage Q&A Forum - Individual question feedhttps://ask.sagemath.org/questions/Q&A Forum for SageenCopyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license.Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:51:05 -0500Exception does not show which line raised ithttps://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/Hi there,
I'm new to sage, and made some sage scripts to improve my python scripts' performances. Then I load my script into a sage session, and run a test function.
When I get exception, it shows me the traceback with functions names only, without the instruction that triggered it. For example :
sage: f.runtest()
Generating keys ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZeroDivisionError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-3-abdb981a9bdb> in <module>()
----> 1 f.runtest()
<string> in runtest(self)
<string> in KeyGen(self)
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/rational.pyx in sage.rings.rational.Rational.__mod__ (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/rational.c:22716)()
2541 n = rat.numer() % other
2542 d = rat.denom() % other
-> 2543 d = d.inverse_mod(other)
2544 return (n * d) % other
2545
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/integer.pyx in sage.rings.integer.Integer.inverse_mod (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/integer.c:38530)()
6169 sig_off()
6170 if r == 0:
-> 6171 raise ZeroDivisionError, "Inverse does not exist."
6172 return ans
6173
ZeroDivisionError: Inverse does not exist.
And I have no idea which line in `KeyGen` does trigger that `ZeroDivisionError`. Any idea ?
Wed, 16 Mar 2016 04:10:32 -0500https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/Comment by kcrisman for <p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I'm new to sage, and made some sage scripts to improve my python scripts' performances. Then I load my script into a sage session, and run a test function.</p>
<p>When I get exception, it shows me the traceback with functions names only, without the instruction that triggered it. For example : </p>
<pre><code>sage: f.runtest()
Generating keys ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZeroDivisionError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-3-abdb981a9bdb> in <module>()
----> 1 f.runtest()
<string> in runtest(self)
<string> in KeyGen(self)
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/rational.pyx in sage.rings.rational.Rational.__mod__ (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/rational.c:22716)()
2541 n = rat.numer() % other
2542 d = rat.denom() % other
-> 2543 d = d.inverse_mod(other)
2544 return (n * d) % other
2545
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/integer.pyx in sage.rings.integer.Integer.inverse_mod (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/integer.c:38530)()
6169 sig_off()
6170 if r == 0:
-> 6171 raise ZeroDivisionError, "Inverse does not exist."
6172 return ans
6173
ZeroDivisionError: Inverse does not exist.
</code></pre>
<p>And I have no idea which line in <code>KeyGen</code> does trigger that <code>ZeroDivisionError</code>. Any idea ?</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?comment=32820#post-id-32820I did read the question, I'm just saying that as a practical matter that is all I can suggest. I don't know why there isn't a longer traceback, and I agree that is very annoying. Normally it should tell the line but perhaps something about `.sage` versus `.py` scripts is the issue.Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:06:12 -0500https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?comment=32820#post-id-32820Comment by matlink for <p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I'm new to sage, and made some sage scripts to improve my python scripts' performances. Then I load my script into a sage session, and run a test function.</p>
<p>When I get exception, it shows me the traceback with functions names only, without the instruction that triggered it. For example : </p>
<pre><code>sage: f.runtest()
Generating keys ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZeroDivisionError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-3-abdb981a9bdb> in <module>()
----> 1 f.runtest()
<string> in runtest(self)
<string> in KeyGen(self)
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/rational.pyx in sage.rings.rational.Rational.__mod__ (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/rational.c:22716)()
2541 n = rat.numer() % other
2542 d = rat.denom() % other
-> 2543 d = d.inverse_mod(other)
2544 return (n * d) % other
2545
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/integer.pyx in sage.rings.integer.Integer.inverse_mod (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/integer.c:38530)()
6169 sig_off()
6170 if r == 0:
-> 6171 raise ZeroDivisionError, "Inverse does not exist."
6172 return ans
6173
ZeroDivisionError: Inverse does not exist.
</code></pre>
<p>And I have no idea which line in <code>KeyGen</code> does trigger that <code>ZeroDivisionError</code>. Any idea ?</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?comment=32818#post-id-32818In fact you didn't read my question. I don't want to resolve the exception, but I want to know **which line raised it in my script**. As you can see, I'm forced to make prints all along the code to search to place where there is an error. With the classic Python traceback, I can directly see where the error is :
./fheoti.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./fheoti.py", line 274, in <module>
sk,pk = f.KeyGen()
File "./fheoti.py", line 169, in KeyGen
1/0
ZeroDivisionError: division by zeroThu, 17 Mar 2016 04:35:48 -0500https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?comment=32818#post-id-32818Comment by kcrisman for <p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I'm new to sage, and made some sage scripts to improve my python scripts' performances. Then I load my script into a sage session, and run a test function.</p>
<p>When I get exception, it shows me the traceback with functions names only, without the instruction that triggered it. For example : </p>
<pre><code>sage: f.runtest()
Generating keys ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZeroDivisionError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-3-abdb981a9bdb> in <module>()
----> 1 f.runtest()
<string> in runtest(self)
<string> in KeyGen(self)
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/rational.pyx in sage.rings.rational.Rational.__mod__ (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/rational.c:22716)()
2541 n = rat.numer() % other
2542 d = rat.denom() % other
-> 2543 d = d.inverse_mod(other)
2544 return (n * d) % other
2545
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/integer.pyx in sage.rings.integer.Integer.inverse_mod (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/integer.c:38530)()
6169 sig_off()
6170 if r == 0:
-> 6171 raise ZeroDivisionError, "Inverse does not exist."
6172 return ans
6173
ZeroDivisionError: Inverse does not exist.
</code></pre>
<p>And I have no idea which line in <code>KeyGen</code> does trigger that <code>ZeroDivisionError</code>. Any idea ?</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?comment=32812#post-id-32812I think it's interesting that the traceback isn't longer (maybe use pdb or http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/repl/sage/misc/trace.html). As to your specific question, maybe knowing what the code is would help find where your problem is. You seem to be looking for an inverse modulo a non-prime for something not in the ring of units, maybe you can see where you do that?Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:55:31 -0500https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?comment=32812#post-id-32812Answer by nbruin for <p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I'm new to sage, and made some sage scripts to improve my python scripts' performances. Then I load my script into a sage session, and run a test function.</p>
<p>When I get exception, it shows me the traceback with functions names only, without the instruction that triggered it. For example : </p>
<pre><code>sage: f.runtest()
Generating keys ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZeroDivisionError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-3-abdb981a9bdb> in <module>()
----> 1 f.runtest()
<string> in runtest(self)
<string> in KeyGen(self)
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/rational.pyx in sage.rings.rational.Rational.__mod__ (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/rational.c:22716)()
2541 n = rat.numer() % other
2542 d = rat.denom() % other
-> 2543 d = d.inverse_mod(other)
2544 return (n * d) % other
2545
/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/sage/rings/integer.pyx in sage.rings.integer.Integer.inverse_mod (/home/hack4u/Download/SageMath/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/integer.c:38530)()
6169 sig_off()
6170 if r == 0:
-> 6171 raise ZeroDivisionError, "Inverse does not exist."
6172 return ans
6173
ZeroDivisionError: Inverse does not exist.
</code></pre>
<p>And I have no idea which line in <code>KeyGen</code> does trigger that <code>ZeroDivisionError</code>. Any idea ?</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?answer=32821#post-id-32821I assume you're using `load("...")`. As you can see from the traceback, python is registering where it got its source from: "<string>". Ipython just doesn't know how to get line numbers for that, or how to display the string (probably because it has been forgotten). This is the standard behaviour of python's "exec":
Python 2.7.10 (default, Sep 24 2015, 17:50:09)
[GCC 5.1.1 20150618 (Red Hat 5.1.1-4)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> exec "def f(): raise RuntimeError\n"
>>> f()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<string>", line 1, in f
RuntimeError
(there does seem to be line information here, but the `<string>` file suggests there's nowhere to look this up)
On ipython's command line and its magic "%load" does store source information beyond a `<string>` directive.
sage: def f(): raise RuntimeError
sage: f()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-31-0ec059b9bfe1> in <module>()
----> 1 f()
<ipython-input-30-5041dc482b26> in f()
----> 1 def f(): raise RuntimeError
(note there's a traceback, and the source file is not just "<string>" but something that looks like a pointer into Ipython's command history)
Short version: as a workaround, you can try `%load myfile.sage` rather than `load("myfile.sage")`.
In the longer run: someone could look into how Ipython stores source for loaded input and see if `sage.repl.load.load` can be adapted to make use of this. It might not be so easy: sage's load has to work more generally than just inside Ipython, and has to be efficient there as well. It may not be able to store source in all cases.Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:51:05 -0500https://ask.sagemath.org/question/32811/exception-does-not-show-which-line-raised-it/?answer=32821#post-id-32821