ASKSAGE: Sage Q&A Forum - RSS feedhttps://ask.sagemath.org/questions/Q&A Forum for SageenCopyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license.Mon, 13 May 2013 19:36:49 +0200Problem with conjugate_transpose of a symbolic matrixhttps://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/ dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
[ 3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 - 2.68953143618644*I
0 0]
[ 0
-3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 + 2.68953143618644*I
0]
[ 0
0 -4]
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate_transpose() + dAbar
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
AttributeError:
'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object has no
attribute 'sech'
I hope their is an easy answer. Thanks, nonlinearSat, 11 May 2013 23:46:41 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/Comment by tmonteil for <pre><code>dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
[ 3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 - 2.68953143618644*I
0 0]
[ 0
-3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 + 2.68953143618644*I
0]
[ 0
0 -4]
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate_transpose() + dAbar
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
AttributeError:
'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object has no
attribute 'sech'
</code></pre>
<p>I hope their is an easy answer. Thanks, nonlinear</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?comment=17715#post-id-17715Could you please add how `x3` and `diagAbar` were constructed so that we can reproduce your problem ?Sun, 12 May 2013 07:00:32 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?comment=17715#post-id-17715Comment by slelievre for <pre><code>dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
[ 3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 - 2.68953143618644*I
0 0]
[ 0
-3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 + 2.68953143618644*I
0]
[ 0
0 -4]
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate_transpose() + dAbar
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
AttributeError:
'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object has no
attribute 'sech'
</code></pre>
<p>I hope their is an easy answer. Thanks, nonlinear</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?comment=17714#post-id-17714A simpler example illustrating the error:
sage: x3 = CIF(3)
sage: B = matrix(CIF,[[3*I*sech(x3), 0], [0, 0]])
Sun, 12 May 2013 09:17:39 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?comment=17714#post-id-17714Answer by tmonteil for <pre><code>dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
[ 3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 - 2.68953143618644*I
0 0]
[ 0
-3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 + 2.68953143618644*I
0]
[ 0
0 -4]
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate_transpose() + dAbar
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
AttributeError:
'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object has no
attribute 'sech'
</code></pre>
<p>I hope their is an easy answer. Thanks, nonlinear</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=14912#post-id-14912You shoud give us more informations about how `x3` and `diagAbar` were constructed.
If i assume, as @slelievre suggests, that `x3` is an element of `CIF` (`Complex Interval Field with 53 bits of precision`), then you can see that no method `.sech()` is implemented for it:
sage: a = CIF(3+I)
sage: a.sech()
AttributeError: 'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object
has no attribute 'sech'
You might be confused by the fact that
sage: sech(CIF(3+I))
sech(3+1*I)
gives you an answer. It is just that the function `sech()` does not find the method `.sech()` for `CIF(3+I)`, then it answers by a symbolic expression `sech(3+1*I)`, as you can see by typing:
sage: sech(CIF(3+I)).parent()
Symbolic Ring
This does not solves anything, since, if you try to get the value of this symbolic expression by converting it to an element of `CIF`, at some point Sage will have to evaluate `CIF(3+I).sech()` which is not implemented:
sage: CIF(sech(CIF(3+I)))
AttributeError: 'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object
has no attribute 'sech'
As you can check, `CIF` seems the only field where `sech` is not implemented:
for field in [RR,RDF,RIF,CC,CDF,CIF,SR]:
print str(field) + ' - ' + str(sech(field(1)).parent())
try:
print str(field(1).sech()) + ' - ' + str(field(1).sech().parent())
except Exception as e:
print e
print ''
But nothing is lost, as you can do it yourself, since elements of `CIF` have an `exp()` method and $sech(x) = \frac{2e^{-x}}{1 + e^{-2x}}$.
Just define:
sage: sech = lambda x: 2*exp(-x)/(1+exp(-2*x))
But be careful, when you write
sage: I * sech(a)
0.0837533280462231? + 0.0540446576423634?*I
the coercion system will do the multiplication in the `Symbolic Ring` since `I` is an element of the `Symbolic Ring`.
sage: (I * sech(a)).parent()
Symbolic Ring
Hence, you should just do:
sage: CIF(I) * sech(a)
0.0837533280462231? + 0.0540446576423634?*I
And now you will be safe, with respect to the fact that our `sech` function did not try to minimize the dimaeters of the intervals defining the output, as much as could have done a direct `.sech()` method defined for elements of `CIF`.
Sun, 12 May 2013 11:08:41 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=14912#post-id-14912Answer by Dionysus for <pre><code>dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
[ 3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 - 2.68953143618644*I
0 0]
[ 0
-3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 + 2.68953143618644*I
0]
[ 0
0 -4]
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate_transpose() + dAbar
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
AttributeError:
'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object has no
attribute 'sech'
</code></pre>
<p>I hope their is an easy answer. Thanks, nonlinear</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=12052#post-id-12052Sorry, Ta was a typo and should not be there. I used
dAbar = dAbar.dense_matrix()
and all is good. Thanks so much tmonteil.
nonlinearMon, 13 May 2013 19:36:49 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=12052#post-id-12052Answer by tmonteil for <pre><code>dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
[ 3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 - 2.68953143618644*I
0 0]
[ 0
-3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 + 2.68953143618644*I
0]
[ 0
0 -4]
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate_transpose() + dAbar
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
AttributeError:
'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object has no
attribute 'sech'
</code></pre>
<p>I hope their is an easy answer. Thanks, nonlinear</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=14918#post-id-14918Just after defining `dAbar`, type:
sage: dAbar = dAbar.dense_matrix()
And it will work.
Now, here are some explanations that may help you to understand what happened, tha may help in further cases (look to the `Traceback`).
You defined your matrix in a sparse way: you only defined the diagonal assuming that the other values are zero. Hence, instead of storing all entries of the matrix, Sage only stores the interesting entries in a dictionary, hence the name `sparse matrix`.
But, at some point (during the `.transpose()` operation), probably to maintain the sparse structure, Sage checks whether some entries are zero. For this, it needs to be sure, hence it uses the safe complex interval arithmetic (where a complex number is approximated by a pair of floating point real intervals containing it).
Unfortunately, as explained [in my previous answer](http://ask.sagemath.org/question/2570/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic?answer=3526#3526), elements of the `Complex Interval Field` (named `CIF`) do not have a `.sech()` method, and you got an error. If you transform your matrix into a dense one (where zeros are explicitely written everywhere), this test is not done and the error does not appear.
By the way, there is another workaround in your case. Before doing any computation, redefine the `sech()` function (as explained in my previous answer), so that it will work for `Complex Interval Field` elements. Before any computation, just type:
sage: sech = lambda x: 2*exp(-x)/(1+exp(-2*x))
And, since the `.exp()` method is defined for elements of `CIF`, then you will not encounter the problem.
Mon, 13 May 2013 05:36:18 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=14918#post-id-14918Answer by Dionysus for <pre><code>dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
[ 3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 - 2.68953143618644*I
0 0]
[ 0
-3.18953143618644*I*sech(x3) - 3.00000000000000 + 2.68953143618644*I
0]
[ 0
0 -4]
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate_transpose() + dAbar
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
AttributeError:
'sage.rings.complex_interval.ComplexIntervalFieldElement' object has no
attribute 'sech'
</code></pre>
<p>I hope their is an easy answer. Thanks, nonlinear</p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=14915#post-id-14915 var('t,x3')
p1= -3+2.5*tanh(2.*t)+(3.19*sech(x3)-2.69)*I
p2= -3+2.5*tanh(2.*t)-(3.19*sech(x3)-2.69)*I
p3=-4
diagAbar= diagonal_matrix(Ta.[p1,p2,p3])
dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
Playing around with dAbar I found that:
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate()
works, but
TdiagAbar=dAbar.transpose()
and
TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate()+dAbar
do not work. Sorry, I didn't follow much of what link said. I do a lot of symbolic math with symbolic variables such as with t and x3 above. I know MATLAB well and Mathematica somewhat. I would prefer to support Sage. Thanks for your help.
nonlinear
Sun, 12 May 2013 22:56:25 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?answer=14915#post-id-14915Comment by tmonteil for <pre><code>var('t,x3')
p1= -3+2.5*tanh(2.*t)+(3.19*sech(x3)-2.69)*I
p2= -3+2.5*tanh(2.*t)-(3.19*sech(x3)-2.69)*I
p3=-4
diagAbar= diagonal_matrix(Ta.[p1,p2,p3])
dAbar=diagAbar.subs(t=0);dAbar
</code></pre>
<p>Playing around with dAbar I found that:</p>
<pre><code>TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate()
</code></pre>
<p>works, but </p>
<pre><code>TdiagAbar=dAbar.transpose()
</code></pre>
<p>and</p>
<pre><code>TdiagAbar=dAbar.conjugate()+dAbar
</code></pre>
<p>do not work. Sorry, I didn't follow much of what link said. I do a lot of symbolic math with symbolic variables such as with t and x3 above. I know MATLAB well and Mathematica somewhat. I would prefer to support Sage. Thanks for your help. </p>
<p>nonlinear </p>
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?comment=17710#post-id-17710Hi, could you ploease provide the definition of `Ta` ?Mon, 13 May 2013 05:07:59 +0200https://ask.sagemath.org/question/10115/problem-with-conjugate_transpose-of-a-symbolic-matrix/?comment=17710#post-id-17710