| 1 | initial version |
There basically no difference. Indeed, if you look at the source code of the __call__ method of formula by typing:
sage: formula.__call__??
you can see that there is :
return self._parent._call_element_(self, *args, **kwds)
So, if you look at the _call_element_ element of the parent of formula (chich is the symbolic ring) by typing:
sage: SR._call_element_??
besides some deprecation warnings, there is:
return _the_element.subs(d, **kwds)
| 2 | No.2 Revision |
There basically no difference. Indeed, if you look at the source code of the __call__ method of formula by typing:
sage: formula.__call__??
you can see that there is :
return self._parent._call_element_(self, *args, **kwds)
So, if you look at the _call_element_ element of the parent of formula (chich (which is the symbolic ring) by typing:
sage: SR._call_element_??
besides some deprecation warnings, there is:
return _the_element.subs(d, **kwds)
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.