1 | initial version |
You can get the list of strings representing your variables as follows:
sage: [str(i) for i in Vlist]
['x', 'y']
So you can define your polynomial ring directly, without the <>
construction:
sage: P = PolynomialRing(QQ, [str(i) for i in Vlist], order='degrevlex')
sage: P
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y over Rational Field
But now, the Python variables x
and y
still point to the symbols x
and y
(that belong to the Symbolic Ring), not the indeterminates x
and y
that belong to P
. For this you can do:
sage: P.inject_variables()
Defining x, y
Then:
sage: f=x^2+y^3
sage: f.lm()
y^3
2 | No.2 Revision |
You can get the list of strings representing your variables as follows:
sage: [str(i) for i in Vlist]
['x', 'y']
So you can define your polynomial ring directly, without the <>
construction:
sage: P = PolynomialRing(QQ, [str(i) for i in Vlist], order='degrevlex')
sage: P
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y over Rational Field
But now, the Python variables x
and y
still point to the symbols x
and y
(that belong to the Symbolic Ring), not the indeterminates x
and y
that belong to P
. For this you can do:
sage: P.inject_variables()
Defining x, y
Then:
sage: f=x^2+y^3
sage: f.lm()
y^3
By the way, note that if your variables are going to be x0
, x1
,...,x9
(say), you can use the following construction:
sage: P = PolynomialRing(QQ, 10, 'x', order='degrevlex')
sage: P
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9 over Rational Field
sage: P.inject_variables()
Defining x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9