1 | initial version |
It seems indeed that you hit a bug:
sage: var('x')
x
sage: function('y', x)
y(x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
TypeError:
When you write var('x')
, two actions are done : it returns the symbolic variable (or "symbol") x
and it gives to the Python variable (or 'name') x
this value. This process of both returning a value and creating a Python variable with the same name is called variable injection, and it is a big source of confusion.
When you write var('x')
, is is the same : it returns the symbolic function y(x)
and it gives to the Python variable (or 'name') y
this value.
The problem comes from the fact that function()
does not inject its result into the Python variable y
correctly:
sage: z = function('y', x)
sage: y
y
sage: z
y(x)
sage: type(y)
<class 'sage.symbolic.function_factory.NewSymbolicFunction'>
sage: type(z)
<type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'>
As you can see, function('y', x)
returned a correct symbolic expression y(x)
, while the Python variable y
got some weird stuff.
So, the workaround is to overwrite the variable injection:
sage: x = var('x')
sage: y = function('y', x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
sage: de
x*e^y(x)*D[0](y)(x) == 2*x^3*e^(2*x) + 2*e^y(x)
Thanks for reporting, actually a similar bug was reported as trac ticket 15025.
2 | No.2 Revision |
It seems indeed that you hit a bug:
sage: var('x')
x
sage: function('y', x)
y(x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
TypeError:
When you write var('x')
, two actions are done : it returns the symbolic variable (or "symbol") x
and it gives to the Python variable (or 'name') x
this value. This process of both returning a value and creating a Python variable with the same name is called variable injection, and it is a big source of confusion.
When you write
, is is function('y', x), it is supposed to be the same : it var('x')returns should return the symbolic function y(x)
and it gives give to the Python variable (or 'name') y
this value.
The problem comes from the fact that function()
does not inject its result into the Python variable y
correctly:
sage: z = function('y', x)
sage: y
y
sage: z
y(x)
sage: type(y)
<class 'sage.symbolic.function_factory.NewSymbolicFunction'>
sage: type(z)
<type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'>
As you can see, function('y', x)
returned a correct symbolic expression y(x)
, while the Python variable y
got some weird stuff.
So, the workaround is to overwrite the variable injection:
sage: x = var('x')
sage: y = function('y', x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
sage: de
x*e^y(x)*D[0](y)(x) == 2*x^3*e^(2*x) + 2*e^y(x)
Thanks for reporting, actually a similar bug was reported as trac ticket 15025.
3 | No.3 Revision |
It seems indeed that you hit a bug:
sage: var('x')
x
sage: function('y', x)
y(x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
TypeError:
When you write var('x')
, two actions are done : it returns the symbolic variable (or "symbol") x
and it gives to the Python variable (or 'name') x
this value. This process of both returning a value and creating a Python variable with the same name is called variable injection, and it is a big source of confusion.
When you write function('y', x)
, it is supposed to be the same : it should return the symbolic function y(x)
and it give to the Python variable (or 'name') y
this value.
The problem comes from the fact that function()
does not inject its result into the Python variable y
correctly:
sage: z = function('y', x)
sage: y
y
sage: z
y(x)
sage: y == z
False
sage: type(y)
<class 'sage.symbolic.function_factory.NewSymbolicFunction'>
sage: type(z)
<type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'>
As you can see, function('y', x)
returned a correct symbolic expression y(x)
, while the Python variable y
got some weird stuff.
So, the workaround is to overwrite the variable injection:
sage: x = var('x')
sage: y = function('y', x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
sage: de
x*e^y(x)*D[0](y)(x) == 2*x^3*e^(2*x) + 2*e^y(x)
Thanks for reporting, actually a similar bug was reported as trac ticket 15025.
4 | No.4 Revision |
It seems indeed that you hit a bug:
sage: var('x')
x
sage: function('y', x)
y(x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
TypeError:
When you write var('x')
, two actions are done : it returns the symbolic variable (or "symbol") x
and it gives to the Python variable (or 'name') x
this value. This process of both returning a value and creating a Python variable with the same name is called variable injection, and it is a big source of confusion.
When you write function('y', x)
, it is supposed to be the same : it should return the symbolic function y(x)
and it give to the Python variable (or 'name') y
this value.
The problem comes from the fact that function()
does not inject its result into the Python variable y
correctly:
sage: z = function('y', x)
sage: y
y
sage: z
y(x)
sage: y == z
False
sage: type(y)
<class 'sage.symbolic.function_factory.NewSymbolicFunction'>
sage: type(z)
<type 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expression'>
As you can see, function('y', x)
returned a correct symbolic expression y(x)
, while the Python variable y
got some different stuff, more precisely a function (with no variable name specifies, somehow similar to cos
or sin
).
So, a first workaround is to overwrite the variable injection:
sage: x = var('x')
sage: y = function('y', x)
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
sage: de
x*e^y(x)*D[0](y)(x) == 2*x^3*e^(2*x) + 2*e^y(x)
Another workaround is to consider y
as a function (whose variable name is not specified), and use the symbolic expression y(x)
, while the Python variable y
got some weird stuff.
So, the workaround is to overwrite the variable injection: in your equation:
sage: x = var('x')
sage: y = function('y', x)
function('y')
y
sage: de = x*e^y*diff(y,x) == 2*(e^y+x^3*e^(2*x))
x*e^y(x)*diff(y(x),x) == 2*(e^y(x)+x^3*e^(2*x))
sage: de
x*e^y(x)*D[0](y)(x) == 2*x^3*e^(2*x) + 2*e^y(x)
Thanks for reporting, actually a similar bug was reported as trac ticket 15025.