First time here? Check out the FAQ!

Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

answered 12 years ago

Jesustc gravatar image

Here's another physicist using Sage, in particular doing a PhD, and I can only encourage you to use Sage any time you can :) It cannot to everything that Mathematica does, but it goes the other way around too. For an undergrad, you won't notice the difference if you are patient in learning Sage.

As an approach for using Sage as a physicist, I would recommend simply going through the tutorial, and asking here or in sage-support any particular concern you may have, starting right now!

click to hide/show revision 2
No.2 Revision

Here's another physicist using Sage, in particular doing a PhD, and I can only encourage you to use Sage any time you can :) It cannot to do everything that Mathematica does, but it goes the other way around too. For an undergrad, you won't notice the difference if you are patient in learning Sage.

As an approach for using Sage as a physicist, I would recommend simply going through the tutorial, and asking here or in sage-support any particular concern you may have, starting right now!

click to hide/show revision 3
No.3 Revision

Here's another physicist using Sage, in particular doing a PhD, and I can only encourage you to use Sage any time you can :) It cannot do everything that Mathematica does, but it goes the other way around too. For an undergrad, you won't notice the difference if you are patient in learning Sage.

As an approach for using Sage as a physicist, I would recommend simply going through the tutorial, and asking here or in sage-support any particular concern you may have, starting right now!

click to hide/show revision 4
No.4 Revision

Here's another physicist using Sage, in particular doing a PhD, and I can only encourage you to use Sage any time you can :) It cannot do everything that Mathematica does, but it goes the other way around too. For an undergrad, you won't notice the difference if you are patient in learning Sage.

As an approach for using Sage as a physicist, I would recommend simply going through the tutorial, and asking here or in sage-support any particular concern you may have, starting right now!

click to hide/show revision 5
No.5 Revision

Here's another physicist using Sage, in particular doing a PhD, and I can only encourage you to use Sage any time you can :) It cannot do everything that Mathematica does, but it goes the other way around too. For an undergrad, you won't notice the difference if you are patient in learning Sage.

As an approach for using Sage as a physicist, I would recommend simply going through the tutorial, and asking here or in sage-support any particular concern you may have, starting right now!

click to hide/show revision 6
No.6 Revision

updated 12 years ago

kcrisman gravatar image

Here's another physicist using Sage, in particular doing a PhD, and I can only encourage you to use Sage any time you can :) It cannot do everything that Mathematica does, but it goes the other way around too. For an undergrad, you won't notice the difference if you are patient in learning Sage.

As an approach for using Sage as a physicist, I would recommend simply going through the tutorial, and asking here or in sage-support any particular concern you may have, starting right now!