| I'm using an older version of Sage (4.5.3) in Ubuntu 10.04. I like it, but I'd like to upgrade to a more recent version. From the command prompt, calling throws a scary warning at me: Question: Is there really a significant advantage to building the binaries from source? I am running a Sony Vaio laptop on 4 2.13 GHz Intel cores. (I can specify more stats if it helps somebody to give me good advice.) |
| I have never build sage from source. It is useful only if you plan on working on the development of sage or modify the source code. Your notebooks are not stored in sage directory but home. So you can just delete the present version, download sage 4.7 and install the binaries. That should work for most users.
Even for development, I use a binary install usually.
niles (Jul 14 '11)
I did not know. I tried modifying code of sage for some reason and I build sage from source. Can you give a reference on how to change code while using binary install.
Shashank (Jul 14 '11)
I think it's the same set of instructions: modify code in $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage, and then rebuild using sage -b.
niles (Jul 14 '11) |
Asked: Jul 13 '11
Seen: 121 times
Last updated: Jul 13 '11
powered by ASKBOT version 0.7.22
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license.