| If I define: var('x,y,z,t') g(t) = (t, t^2, t^3) f(x,y,z) = (2x,y+x+z,yx) Is there a way for me to define the composite f(g(t)) without going through: f(g(t)[0],g(t)[1],g(t)[2]) or something equally ugly? |
| If you let If you want to define both
You don't need f to be a lambda function for this; using "f(x,y,z) = (2*x,y+x+z,y*x)" works just fine.
John Palmieri (Apr 09 '11)
Thank you for the alternative. For the moment it looks like non-lambda functions work well. I'm not well versed in python and I'd like to make things look as much like mathematical notation as possible. Also, it seems using other properties (methods, functions?) like jacobian and derivative is more straight forward if lambda functions are avoided.
BobB (Apr 10 '11) |
| h(t) = f(*g(t))
Great! And very quick, thank you.
I suppose I would have known that if I knew something about python?
Or is * a sage operator of some sort?
BobB (Apr 09 '11)
It's a python thing -- see benjaminfjones' answer.
John Palmieri (Apr 09 '11)
But it might be nice to have this work without that. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11180; if someone can come up with a better title for that ticket, be my guest.
kcrisman (Apr 11 '11) |
Asked: Apr 09 '11
Seen: 113 times
Last updated: Apr 09 '11
powered by ASKBOT version 0.7.22
Copyright Sage, 2010. Some rights reserved under creative commons license.